Posts Tagged ‘kafirs’

Civilization Jihad aka Stealth Jihad

civilization jihad aka stealth jihadI. Origins of Civilization Jihad (Stealth Jihad)

August 2004, an alert Maryland Transportation Authority Police officer observed a woman wearing traditional Islamic garb videotaping the support structures of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, and conducted a traffic stop. The driver was Ismail Elbarasse and detained on an outstanding material witness warrant issued in Chicago in connection with fundraising for Hamas. In the basement of his home in Annandale, VA, a hidden sub-basement was found, containing 80 banker boxes of the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America. One of the most important of these documents was the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan for the United States and was entitled, “An Explanatory Memorandum On The General Strategic Goal For The Group In North America” (English version or Arabic version), written in May 1991 primarily by Mohamed Akram, a former director of the United Association of Studies and Research (UASR), a Hamas front that was based in Northern Virginia from 1991 to 2004. UASR, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation terrorist finance trial case that this document was entered into evidence, was headed by Ahmed Yousef who now serves as political advisor to head of Hamas in Gaza, Ismail Haniya.


Muslim Brotherhood’s plan and Obama’s connection exposed.


An Explanatory Memorandum explains that the Muslim Brotherhood-organized “Islamic Movement” in the US is a “settlement process” to establish itself in the United States and, once entrenched, to undertake a “grand jihad” characterized as a “civilization jihadist” mission under Muslim Brotherhood direction. The Muslim Brotherhood is relying on non-Muslims in America to aid it, usually inadvertently, to destroy America from within.

In the introductory letter, Akram referenced a “long-term plan, approved and adopted” by the Shura Council in 1987 and proposed this memo as a supplement to that plan and requested that the memo be added to the agenda for an upcoming Council meeting. Appended to the document is a list of all Muslim Brotherhood organizations in North America as of 1991.


Muslim Brotherhood’s web of terror, Part 2: Civilization Jihad aka Stealth Jihad.



Appearance can be deceiving. Nefarious Civilization Jihadists wear suits & ties, not kufi cap nor thobe. Wolf under sheep’s clothing. For example,  CAIR & Muslim Brotherhood terrorists.

II. A few notable quotes

The page numbers noted below correspond to the page numbers in the center of the bottom of each page in the document. 

Page 4:

Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic state, wherever it is.

Page 5:

In order for Islam and its Movement to become “a part of the homeland” in which it lives, “stable” in its land, “rooted” in the spirits and minds of its people, “enabled” in the live [sic] of its society and has firmly-established “organizations” on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry out this grand mission as a “Civilization Jihadist” responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in this country.

Page 7:

“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

“[W]e must possess a mastery of the art of ‘coalitions’, the art of ‘absorption’ and the principles of ‘cooperation.’”

But the more dangerous long-term threat is what the Muslim Brotherhood calls “civilization jihad” phase, which  is considered an integral, even dominant element of jihad, precedes “violent jihad” phase.

Such tactics are ostensibly “non-violent” (and therefore “moderate”) not because the Muslim Brotherhood eschews violence out of principle, but because it has decided that this phase of battlefield preparation is better accomplished through stealthy means. Hence civilization jihad can be considered “stealth jihad.”

Civilization jihad is a form of political and psychological warfare that includes multi-layered cultural subversion, the co-opting and recruiting of senior leaders, influence operations, propaganda and other means of insinuating shariah gradually into Western societies.

The violence is always implicit in the overall strategy, albeit held in reserve for the final stages of the offensive. It is the combined effect of the violent and pre-violent strains of jihad that constitutes the most serious threat to America and its free people.

III. The Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘Phased Plan’

The Elbarasse’s trove of Muslim Brotherhood’s documents shows that the goal of destroying Western Civilization from within is to be achieved with a “phased plan” that divide the conquest of the non-Muslim world into either 5 or 7 phases.

The plan is a stepped process modeled directly after Sayiid Qutb’s Milestones and the shariah doctrine of progressive revelation. One such document is an undated paper entitled, “Phases of The World Underground Movement Plan.” It specifies the 5 phases of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement in North America and offers a chilling operational insight into the mindset, planning, and vision of the Islamic movement in North America.

Phase One: Phase of discreet and secret establishment of leadership.

Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities (It greatly succeeded in implementing this stage). It also succeeded in achieving a great deal of its important goals, such as infiltrating various sectors of the Government. Gaining religious institutions and embracing senior scholars. Gaining public support and sympathy. Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.

Phase Three: Escalation phase, prior to conflict and confrontation with the rulers, through utilizing mass media. Currently in progress.

Phase Four: Open public confrontation with the Government through exercising the political pressure approach. It is aggressively implementing the above-mentioned approach. Training on the use of weapons domestically and overseas in anticipation of zero-hour. It has noticeable activities in this regard.

Phase Five: Seizing power to establish their Islamic Nation under which all parties and Islamic groups are united.”

How Islam is destroying Europe.

IV. The Implementation of Shariah by the Muslim Brotherhood

The Elbarasse archives and close observation of the Brotherhood’s operations reveal the following as the most important of the techniques employed by the Ikhwan in America to achieve the seditious goals of its civilization jihad:

• Expanding the Muslim presence by birth rate, immigration, and refusal to assimilate;

• Occupying and expanding domination of physical spaces;

• Ensuring the “Muslim Community” knows and follows MB doctrine;

• Controlling the language we use in describing the enemy;

• Ensuring we do not study their doctrine (shariah);

• Co-opting key leadership;

• Forcing compliance with shariah at local levels;

• Fighting all counterterrorism efforts;

• Subverting religious organizations;

• Employing lawfare – the offensive use of lawsuits and threats of lawsuits;

• Claiming victimization / demanding accommodations;

• Condemning “slander” against Islam;

• Subverting the U.S. education system, in particular, infiltrating and dominating U.S. Middle East studies programs;

• Demanding the right to practice shariah in segregated Muslim enclaves;

• Demanding recognition of shariah in non-Muslim spheres;

• Confronting and denouncing Western society, laws, and traditions; and

• Demanding that shariah replace Western law. Note that many of the foregoing techniques entail, in one way or another, influencing and neutralizing the American government at all levels.

V. Subjugation of the “kafirs”

Dawa, the call to Islam that by Islamic law must precede jihad, is all-too-often dismissed, as are its manifestations under the rubric of non-violent jihad, simply because this kind of assault does not kill. Instead, it intends “merely” to subjugate.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, told a Toledo, Ohio, Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in 1995, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through the sword, but through dawa.”

Absent an appreciation of the threat posed by stealth jihad, the pre-violent civilization jihadist is free to proceed unimpeded under the radar in Western societies, infiltrating and subverting along lines specifically tailored to today’s liberal, multicultural-minded non-Muslim populations. It does so in ways that are genuinely difficult to recognize, oppose or counter.

The objective of civilization jihad, also known as stealth jihad, is the same as the violent form of jihad: subjugation of Dar al-Harb (the “House of War,” or the non-Muslim world) to Shariah, which would result in the non-Muslim population of being controlled by Dar al-Islam, or the House of Islam.

The Brotherhood has the dominant role in the execution of the pre-violent form of jihad in the United States. The insinuation of shariah and its adherents into America’s academic, banking and finance, government, intelligence, law enforcement and military institutions – as well as civil society more generally – is quite far advanced.

VI. Expanding the observant Muslim base

The concept of “expanding the observant Muslim base” (al-Qaida al-Islamia al-Moltzema), a tactical term found in the memorandum (1991), well more than 10 years before Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri helped form a global coalition of 12 Islamist groups called the World Islamic Front (aka the global jihad front or al-Qaida), then declared jihad on America and Israel on Feb. 23, 1998.

In fact, Zawahiri, who is the leader of al-Qaeda, was not only a member of the Brotherhood in his native Egypt but also bases his operational templates on the views of prominent Islamic theorists like al-Banna and Qutb.

Many Americans, and non-Muslims for that matter, today still do not realize that the ideology of a wide spectrum of Islamic macro-groups, such as al-Shabaab, Hamas, ISIS and the World Islamic Front are all based on exactly the same aggressive goals and concepts that were summarized and endorsed in 1987 by the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.

In simple terms, every Islamic group mentioned above is engaged in their own regional version of “expanding the observant Muslim base.” In Arabic, the document is a concise, densely written manifesto, distilling 1,400 years of strategy and tactics used since the time of Muhammad to advance the “global Islamic state.” The term al-Qaida (“the base,” or القاعدة in Arabic) is not the name of just another Muslim terrorist organization tied to the 9/11 attack, is also an abstract concept with a deep Islamic history behind it.

For example, after Muhammad established his final Qaida in Medina in A.D. 622, it became the power base of Islam for the next hundred years, initially under Muhammad’s leadership and then under four “rightly guided caliphs.”

Muslim terrorism worldwide 2015The black flag of ISIS features the “seal of Muhammad,” which goes back to the founding of Islam in A.D. 610.

The Muslim Brotherhood has maintained a highly visible leading role in the global effort to “expand the observant Muslim base” since it was founded in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna in close collaboration with Sayyid Qutb, who both began attracting thousands of dedicated followers from countries all over the world. To this day, the Muslim Brotherhood remains the largest and most well-organized global Islamic organization which continues providing a solid, reliable theological and political base to fellow members in nearly every country in the world.

7. Tactics:

a. Political activism- organizing Muslim Capitol Days, in Texas, in Michigan, in Missouri, in Iowa, in Florida, etc. and now spreading to Oklahoma and the rest of U.S. Boy and Girl Scouts, under terrorist front group Muslim American Society (MAS), in violation of scouting rules, are employed to make voter calls using a MAS script.

b. Campaigning for Shariah Law- such as one in Irvin, Texas

c. Gaining concessions from the kafirs continuously, bit by bit, piece by piece, and weaken the host country’s constitution, law, and order by …

i. Playing the Muslim religious card, or Islamophobia-in schools, colleges and universities, courthouses, workplaces, entertainment parks.

Muslim woman plays the race card heavily against Australian police.


Muslims use race card and manipulated words like “racism” (Islam is NOT a race) and “bigotry” (all Muslims are bigots who are ordered by Quran to be intolerant of, and killing all, non-Muslims) to win concession from the kafirs, and disarming their laws and Constitutions while installing Sharia Law in the process.


ii. Playing the Muslim race card-in schools, colleges and universities, courthouses, workplaces, entertainment parks.

VII. Using terrorist front groups as vehicles

The Memorandum identifies the following groups under the heading “a list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends”:

  • Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
  • Muslim Student Association (MSA)
  • The Muslim Communities Association (MCA)
  • The Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS)
  • The Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers (AMSE)
  • Islamic Medical Association (IMA)
  • Islamic Teaching Center (ITC)
  • North American Islamic Trust (NAIT)
  • Foundation for International Development (FID)
  • Islamic Housing Cooperative (IHC)
  • Islamic Centers Division (ICD)
  • American Trust Publications (ATP)
  • Audio-Visual Center (AVC)
  • Islamic Book Service (IBS)
  • Muslim Businessmen Association (MBA)
  • Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA)
  • ISNA Fiqh Committee (IFC)
  • ISNA Political Awareness Committee (IPAC)
  • Islamic Education Department (IED)
  • Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA)
  • Malasian (sic) Islamic Study Group (MISG)
  • Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP)
  • United Association for Studies and Research (UASR)
  • Occupied Land Fund (OLF)
  • Mercy International Association (MIA)
  • Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA)
  • Baitul Mal Inc (BMI)
  • International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT)
  • Islamic Information Center (IIC)
  • North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), which the following subsidiaries:
•  American Trust Publications (ATP)
•  Americans for Constructive Engagement (AMCE)
•  Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers (AMSE)
•  Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS)
•  Audio-Visual Center (AVC)
•  Baitul Mal, Inc. (BMI)
•  Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)
•  Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA)
•  Foundation for International Development (FID)
•  Holy Land Foundation (HLF)
•  Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP)
•  Islamic Book Service (IBS)
•  Islamic Centers Division (ICD)
•  Islamic Education Department (IED)
•  Islamic Free Market Institute (IFMI)
•  Islamic Housing Cooperative (IHC)
•  Islamic Information Center (IIC).
•  Islamic Medical Association (IMA)
•  Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
•  Islamic Teaching Center (ITC)
•  International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT)
•  Malaysian Islamic Study Group (MISG)
•  Mercy International Association (MIA)
•  Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA)
•  Muslim Businessmen Association (MBA)
•  Muslim Communities Association (MCA)
•  Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA)
•  Occupied Land Fund (OLF)
•  United Association for Studies and Research (UASR)

Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) , the Islamic Free Market Institute (II), and US Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO) were later added.



Historical and strategical developments of the international terror groups (Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Jaamat Islami), sponsored by Saudi Arabia, the world’s leading financier of terrorism worldwide.

In 2014, U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO) established a political framework with the aim of influencing U.S. elections and electing Islamists in Washington, with the ultimate objective of establishing Shariah law in U.S. It is a ‘coalition’, or an umbrella group, consisting of 6 other terrorist front organizations:

Muslim American Society (MAS)
American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
Islamic Circle of North American (ICNA)
Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA)
Muslim Alliance in North America (MANA)
Muslim Ummah of North America (MUNA)


VIII. References















David Schanzer and Charles Kurzman

David Schanzer and Charles KurtzmanThese 2 Muslim appeasing, terrorist sympathizing,  facts ignoring, lies promoting, pedagogically sophistical village idiots continue parading their uttered nonsense and ridiculous reasoning to obfuscate the truth, keeping the “kafirs” in the dark just to please their Arab master and to hold on to their pseudo-academic jobs, betraying and selling America their own country, their fellow countrymen and countrywomen, and the future of their own offspring for cheap. Thanks to these immoral liberal traitors, the Benedict Arnold’s of the Islamization millennium, the already dangerous world has become even more dangerous, and increasingly so.

I. His book

1.  I am not making this up. The Missing Martyrs: Why There Are So Few Muslim Terrorists. WTF!? Huh? Whoahh? #$%&!? or any reactive exclamations that might have to be beeped out on national TV, one might add. Yes, that was the actual title of the book that Mr. Charles Kurzman published. The stupidity sprouting out of his reasoning is simply astounding, beyond the scope of discussion of this blog, and perhaps only surpassed by his undignified obsequity toward his Arab master. Therefore, only the salient points are mentioned here. In the book, he stated that:

a. He said that because the world’s Muslim population was 1.6 billion strong and anti-Americanism parallels terrorism, the goal of his book was to explain why the world had not witnessed more acts of Islamist terror.

– Well, unless Mr. Kurzman has been experiencing  halal meat-induced delirium, toxic death cult-induced dementia, or cognitive dysfunction due to the mind numbing effect of Ramadan, terrorist events caused by Muslims actually have increased, significantly, in frequency and magnitude, in number and variety of chosen victims, in implementations and geographical areas targeted, year over year! One only needs to examine some recent terrorist events with their death tolls  … 5,000 Yazidis men shot, 7,000 women held as sex slaves in late 2014, again all victims were civilians. That death toll was still not high enough for you? How about the additional 600 Yazidis killed in May 2015? Again all victims were civilians. Oh that was just the Yazidis victimized, right? Wrong! How about 21 Coptic Christians killed in February 2015? Again, all victims were civilians.  Not enough geographical variety for you? That was just the usual incendiary Middle East that got terrorized, right? Wrong! How about terrorist attacks in France, Tunisia and Kuwait, across 3 continents, all in one day, week one of Ramadan,  June 2015? Again all victims were civilians. At least the terrorists have spared the teenagers, right? Wrong!  How about Somali Militants Kill 147 students at Kenyan University in April 2015? Again all victims were civilians. At least the terrorists have spared the very young children, right? Wrong again! How about 141 of mostly Pakistani students killed in December 2014? Again all victims were civilians. The rest can be referenced here in details, if needed …

Terrorism on American soil since 9/11

Muslim terrorism worldwide in 2015

Muslim terrorism worldwide in 2014

Muslim terrorism worldwide in 2013

(Click to enlarge)

Muslim-terrorist-attack-in-Chattanooga,-TN,-July-16,-2015 Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino, CA Muslim terrorist attack. Umpqua Community College Muslim terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida Muslim terrorist 9-11 hijackers

(Click to enlarge)

b.  He explained one reason was that most Muslims did not share the conviction that targeting innocent civilians was acceptable.

– Wrong again! %49.9 of Muslims support Bin Laden. %38 of Muslims support killing civilians, like the 9/11 attack that killed 3,000 American civilians.

c. He said that there were many terrorist groups, which meant these diverse groups did not always share the same ideology and hence, drawing conclusion for the entire Muslim population was wrong.

– Wrong again! All the terrorist groups might differ in the nuances of self-interests, but they all followed the Koran to the “dotted t” in merciless killing of the “kafirs”, or non-Muslims (and the apostates), imposing Shariah Law on their lands, engaging in global jihads, and ultimately establishing a global Islamic Caliphate. Heck, they even followed the same protocol in solving the differences among themselves, i.e. agreeing on killing each other to settle the disputes.

d. He said that the anti-American sentiment cannot go any lower.

– Maybe, maybe not, but that is irrelevant because Muslims are taught by the Koran to be anti non-Muslims which include more than just Americans. In short, Muslims are anti-everyone, even themselves, hence, their having continued killing each other for centuries since 7th century, in the past, present, and likely future as well for a long time to come.

e. He said that economically speaking, American foreign policy could do nothing to change consumer sentiment, because the way in which the Islamic world responded to American foreign policy was inelastic. Only in Turkey and Indonesia showed noticeable changes in “consumer sentiment” due to favorable trades with US. In contrast, anti-Americanism may be so entrenched that changes in U.S. foreign policy would not make much difference.

– US and the West have been buying oil from Saudi Arabia and giving it a favorable trading status for decades, yet it still managed to send 15 (out of 19) of its nationals as terrorist hijackers to commence the 9/11 attack. Care to explain that, Mr. Kurzman ? Out of humanity and goodwill, the West immediately assisted Indonesia to cope with the tsunami disaster in 2004 that killed 200,000 Indonesians, even after the 2002 terrorist attack in Bali that killed 202 people, including 164 Westerners, yet this Muslim imam Syed Soharwardy, the founder of Islamic Supreme Council of Canada (ISCC) from Calgary, Canada said on Jan. 23, 2005: ” ISCC. . . strongly condemns the exploitation of tsunami victims by the Christian missionaries. There have been several reports that the Christian missionaries are kidnapping Muslim children in Indonesia. . . . It is now proven that the Christian missionaries do not help people on humanitarian grounds. They help people in order to exploit their needs and convert them to Christianity.” Of course, that turned out to be a lie. The act was not only hateful and ungrateful, but also downright pathological, vindictive, and venomous, returning goodwill with bad intention, paying generosity with animosity. If imam as Islamic spiritual leader is such undignified, immoral, low-classed, criminally opportunistic, falsely accusative, shamelessly lying thug with a demeanor and character that put those of a weasel to shame, what can the world expect from the followers of the cult? The rest of this Muslim’s taqiyya/kitman antics can also be viewed here at the Calgary Herald.


And get this, he was a founding member of the group Muslims Against Terrorism in 1998.

f. He explained that, in Pakistan, for example, only %23 of respondents expressed a favorable view of America in 2000. At this low level there wasn’t much room for decline during the Bush administration. So even though favorable responses dropped by more than half in 2002, this change only amounted to %13 of the sample, a far smaller proportion than the %50 of Turks and %60 of Indonesians who changed their minds during the same period.

– Again, the relative proportions pro-American versus anti-American in any particular Muslim country at any particular point in time is a moot point, as Muslims and Muslim terrorists are not just anti-American, they are anti-democracy, anti-freedom, anti-Western values, anti-all things non-Muslim.

g. He wrote in Homegrown terrorism threat was overhyped: Opinion

“To many, the Boston attack on April 15, 2013, demonstrated the potency of the Islamist extremist ideology, the difficulty of detecting individuals radicalized through social media and the internet, and the ease with which amateurs could cause massive harm in our open society. The Tsarnaev brothers, they claimed, had paved the way for more terrorism. .

Our research shows that in the year since the marathon bombing, there have been 15 arrests of Muslims living in United States for terrorism-related offenses, below the average of 20 arrests per year since 9/11. Almost all of these arrests were for attempting to join a foreign terrorist organization abroad, not for planning attacks in the homeland, and were motivated by sympathies with rebels in Syria and elsewhere rather than by al Qaeda’s call for Muslims to attack the West.”

II. His writings and interviews

1. “Our research shows that in the year since the marathon bombing, there have been 15 arrests of Muslim-Americans for terrorism-related offenses, below the average of 20 arrests per year since 9/11. Almost all of these arrests were for attempting to join a foreign terrorist organization abroad, not for planning attacks in the homeland, and were motivated by sympathies with rebels in Syria and elsewhere rather than by al Qaeda’s call for Muslims to attack the West.”

– The number of Muslim terrorists  living in United States arrests actually increased, not decreased, as per terrorism on U.S. soil since 9/11. The updated statistics became available as early as April 2015, yet Mr. Kurzman conveniently and persistently clung on to out-of-date, cherry-picked, heavily manipulated, falsely collected and controlled data (explanations below) that supported his agenda, in order to scurrily, deviously, and shamelessly cram his laughable and so-called pseudo science research into his writings and interviews even 2 months later in June 2015, hoping no one would have noticed and called him fouled and out into his face.

2. “There also has been no epidemic of al Qaeda inspired extremist behavior directed at American civilians. While only one year has passed, much of this concern appears to have been hyperbole. No one has been killed by homegrown terrorists in the past year and there have been no copycat attacks.”

-And the increased security as a deterrent measure has nothing to do with it? Out of stupidity or willful omission, (or both), he totally ignored the effect of increased security as a deterrent measure (as the result of the Boston Bombing) that might very well have prevented many terrorist incidents from happening. It is a case of mixing cause and effect, a basic and known error trap in any research statistics. How could it be possible that a college faculty like you missed the basic fundamentals of academic research? or were you just intentionally lying and obfuscating the truth all in the sake of your pay checks from your Arab master in Saudi Arabia that funded your pseudo-academic position to conduct pseudo-research in a pseudo-scientific institute like Center of Middle Eastern Studies?

3. “To put this in context, over the same period there have been 14,000 murders in the United States, including 46 murders in Boston.”

– Those murders were mostly uncontrollable events. So by Mr. Schanzer’s logics, preventive measures for controllable events should be ignored, dismantled, or not implemented at all just because the mortality rates of some other uncontrollable events were much higher than %2.0, the mortality rate of terrorist events in U.S., anyway? Nevermind the fact that those preventive measures could actually be the causes of the lower mortality rate to start with, as previously discussed.

Mortality rates of selective causes of deaths

Disease Mortality (%) Deaths per 100,000 Male Deaths Female Deaths
Lung cancer 2.18 20.0 28.4 11.4
Road traffic accidents 2.09 19.1 40.8 10.4
Hypertensive heart disease 1.60 14.6 13.4 15.9
Suicide 1.53 14.0 17.4 10.6
Colorectal cancer 1.09 10.0 10.3 9.7
Measles 1.07 9.8 9.8 9.9
Violence 0.98 9.0 14.2 3.7
Breast cancer 0.84 7.7 0.1 15.3
Falls 0.69 6.3 7.5 5.0
Drowning 0.67 6.1 8.4 3.9
Poisoning 0.61 5.6 7.2 4.0
Fires 0.55 5.0 3.8 6.2
Pertussis 0.52 4.7 4.7 4.8
Prostate cancer 0.47 4.3 8.6 0.0
War 0.30 2.8 5.0 0.5

Therefore, by Mr. Schanzer’s logics …

Why stop smoking or medically screen for lung cancer at all, because lung cancer has only %2.18 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive and diagnostic measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of lung cancer? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to learn how to drive, get driver’s license, take defensive driving classes, or use seat belt at all, because road traffic accidents carry only %2.09 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of road traffic accidents? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to eat vegetables, watch one’s diet, lower cholesterol, do exercises at all, because hypertensive heart disease carries only %1.60 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of hypertensive heart disease  Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to have education, establish social counseling services, or institute suicide hotlines at all, because suicide carries only %1.53 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of suicide? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to screen for colon cancer and beast cancer at all, because they carry only %1.09 and %0.84 mortality rates, respectively? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of colon cancer and beast cancer ? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to be vaccinated for measles (with mumps and rubella in MMR vaccine) and pertussis (with diphtheria and tetanus, dTaP vaccine) at all, because  they carry only %1.07 and %0.52 mortality rates, respectively? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of measles and pertussis? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to install handrails on stairwells, stage guardrails on balconies,  give walkers and canes to the elderly, at all, since accidental falls carry only %0.69 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to lower the mortality rate of accidental falls? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to have physical exams for prostate cancer at all, because it carries only %0.47 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures helping to lower its mortality rate? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Why bother to have a learn self-defense (or build a national defense department, for that matter) at all, because war carries only %0.30 mortality rate? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures helping to lower its mortality rate? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

Last but not least, why bother to implement Transportation Security Administration (TSA)’s airport screenings and airport checking protocols at all, because suicidal airline hijackings have carried an absolutely stunning %0.0 mortality rate since the 9/11 attack? Wait, aren’t those preventive measures actually helping to protect the civilians and prevent 9/11-like attacks from happening again? Apparently not, according to Mr. Schanzer’s logics.

3. There was no statistical control group here, as the two subject populations were vastly different in numerical quantities. There were currently 5 million Muslims, or %1.7 of the USA’s population, so the comparison analysis wouldn’t make sense at all unless it was accordingly adjusted for the population base. 15 arrests of Muslims living in United States for terrorism-related offenses out of a Muslim population of 3 millions. How many non-Muslim Americans for terrorism-related offenses out of a non-Muslim population of 317 millions? He refused to say, but the math goes like this: in order for the kuffar (non-Muslim) Americans to be arrested for terrorism-related offenses with the same frequency as those of the Muslims living in United States, and because kuffar American population is approximately 100 times that of Muslims living in America, there would have been at least 100 times (or 106 times, to be exact) more arrests, i.e., or 15 x 100 = 1,500 arrests of non-Muslims Americans. In realty, that number was less than 10, but for the sake of argument, let’s assume it to be 10. Therefore, Muslims living in America are more than 1,500 / 10 = 150 times more likely to commit terrorist acts than kuffar Americans. 150 times (or %151,000)!! Let that sink in! How could the demonic way of life of the people who are 150 times more likely to commit terrorist acts, be called a religion, and not for what it really is- some toxic death rape cult, let alone a “Religion of Peace?

4.“A nationwide survey of law enforcement agencies we are conducting in collaboration with the Police Executive Research Forum shows that more than half of the agencies report little or no threat from al Qaeda-inspired extremism. Only 2 percent report the threat as ‘severe.’ Agencies from large metropolitan areas reported somewhat higher levels of concern (27 percent reporting a low threat and 7 percent reporting a severe threat). Overall, law enforcement agencies are treating this as a serious, but manageable, issue rather than the existential crisis that many have feared.”

– What would the frequency of the severe threat level have been without the exhaustive preventive measures, either in rural or metropolitan areas? %2? %7? %27? or %93 and %98? Take your pick, please. What is the likelihood of another 9/11 attack without airport screening? %2? %7? %27? or %93 and %98? Take your pick, please.

5. “One year after two individuals inflicted pain and suffering on the streets of Boston, we should not be overly fearful or cavalier about the threat of violent extremism.”

– Violent extremism? A keyword is missing here and it starts with the letter ‘I’, and it’s the same word that Mr. Obama refused to use in reference to ISIS, despite the fact that ISIS even consists ‘I” in its name. In addition, %49.9, %38, or even %19 of something is not usually considered “extreme” on the spectrum, of Islamic violence, of political affiliation, of temperature variations, of coloration of halal meat, or of anything else, for that matter. Because violence and terrorism, death and destruction, are inherent in the teachings of Islam, in the conducts of its worshipers, both inside and outside of their families, let’s be correct, albeit not politically, and call it for what it is, the threat of violent Islamic fundamentalism. There, wasn’t that so bad?

6. “The low levels of violent conduct both before and after the Boston Marathon show that no matter how many extremist videos are posted on the internet, the baseless ideas these videos propagate appeal to only a tiny fraction of our populace.”

– Wrong! As previously referenced, %49.9 Muslims support Bin Laden, and %38 Muslims support the 9/11 attack that killed 3,000 civilians. %49.9 or %38 of something is not a tiny fraction, and neither is %19. As recently as 2013,  as many as %19 Muslim Americans (about 1 in 5), 26% of Muslims in Bangladesh, 29% in Egypt, 39% in Afghanistan and 40% in the Palestinian territories approve violent attacks against civilians, according to a study from Pew Research Center. This, along with the fact that Muslim Americans are at least 150 times more likely to commit terrorist acts than non-Muslim Americans, as the analysis above showed, should refute your self-promoted assessment and debunk any agenda-laden myth that terrorism “appeals to only a tiny fraction” of the American populace.

7. “Yet, since small numbers of people can do so much harm, law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve must be constantly vigilant and continue to work together to prevent the next atrocity.”

– This seems the only correct statement made by Mr. Schanzer during the whole interview.

8. “Charles Kurzman is a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Charles Kurzman is also co-director of  UNC Chapel Hill’s Carolina Center for the Study of the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations,  Duke Islamic Studies Center and a regular contributor to ISLAMiCommentary.”

– There you go, Mr. Kurzman is on Saudi Arabia’s payroll, considering that country has spent $2 trillion to advocate wahhabism and madrasa abroad, building mosques and Centers for Middle East studies, similar to Carolina Center for the Study of the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations, worldwide. That explains a lot, though most American patriots would likely conduct themselves with more integrity, academic and otherwise.

9. “David Schanzer is a professor at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public Policy and director of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security. David H. Schanzer is also core faculty with the Duke Islamic Studies Center and a regular contributor to ISLAMiCommentary

– There you go, Mr. Schanzer is on Saudi Arabia’s payroll, considering that country has spent $2 trillion to advocate wahhabism and madrasa abroad, building mosques and Centers for Middle East studies, similar to Carolina Center for the Study of the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations, worldwide. That explains a lot, though most American patriots would likely conduct themselves with more integrity, academic and otherwise.

(Click to enlarge)

Muslim-terrorist-attack-in-Chattanooga,-TN,-July-16,-2015 Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino, CA Muslim terrorist attack. Umpqua Community College Muslim terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida Muslim terrorist 9-11 hijackers

(Click to enlarge)