Posts Tagged ‘Republicans’

Harry Reid’s extensive scandals and ethics violations

Harry Reid’s scandals and ethics violations

Image result for harry reidOver the course of his political career, Harry Reid has been implicated in numerous ethics scandals:

1. Fraudulent real estate deals.

In a 1998 real-estate deal engineered by Jay Brown (a former casino lawyer and a longtime friend of Reid), the senator purchased two undeveloped residential-property lots on Las Vegas’s rapidly growing outskirts for approximately $400,000. Reid bought one of the parcels on his own, and the second one jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap supported by Reid.

In 2001 Reid sold both of his lots for $400,000 to a limited liability corporation created by Jay Brown, but he never disclosed the sale on his annual public ethics report. Nor did he inform Congress that he held any stake in Brown’s company. As far as Congress knew, Reid was still the owner of the two lots he had purchased three years earlier.
In 2004 Brown’s company, having negotiated with local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, sold the land to other developers, and Reid personally took $1.1 million of the proceeds—a $700,000 profit on his initial investment.
Reid falsely reported the transaction to Congress as a personal land sale. When questioned about the deal during a telephone interview with the Associated Press in October 2006, Reid hung up the phone.

2. Co-Mingling personal and political funds.

In 2001 Reid paid cash for a $750,000 condominium at the Washington, DC Ritz-Carlton where he currently resides. When he subsequently (in 2002, 2004, and 2005) gave $3,300 in Christmas bonuses to the doorman and other support staff at his building, Reid, in contravention of federal election law, used money that he had acquired from campaign donations rather than his own separate funds.

Reid’s campaign falsely listed the bonuses as campaign “salary” expenditures for two of the years in question, and as a “contribution” for the other year. When news of Reid’s misappropriation of campaign funds became public in 2006, the senator’s office said that the listing as “salary” had been a “clerical error.” Added Reid: “I am reimbursing the campaign from my own pocket to prevent this issue from being used in the current campaign season to deflect attention from Republican failures.”

3. Favors for wealthy real-estate developers.

In a $286 billion federal transportation bill passed by Congress in 2005, Reid secured $300 million in earmarks for projects in his home state, including $18 million to fund the construction of a bridge spanning the Colorado River. On the Arizona side of that bridge, Reid owned 160 acres of undeveloped land (in Bullhead City, AZ) around which many new housing units were being built. The new bridge would cause the value of Reid’s property to skyrocket.

Moreover, the circumstances surrounding his acquisition of that land are noteworthy:

In 2002, Reid paid $10,000 to a pension fund controlled by his longtime friend, Las Vegas lubricants distributor Clair Haycock. That payment earned the senator full control of the 160-acre parcel of land. (According to the Los Angeles Times, $10,000 was only one-tenth of the land’s estimated value — and one-fortieth of what it had sold for ten years earlier. As of 2012, Reid’s financial disclosure form listed the property’s value as somewhere between $250,000 and $500,000.)

Six months after Reid made this $10,000 payment, he introduced legislation to address the hardships confronting lubricants dealers whose supplies had been disrupted by the decisions of big oil companies—an issue the Haycock family had previously brought to Reid’s attention. As the Los Angeles Times points out: “It is a potential violation of congressional ethics standards for a member to accept anything of value—including a real estate discount—from a person with interests before Congress.”

Reid on several occasions has used legislation to move federal land into private hands, and private land into the public realm—invariably portraying these transactions as efforts to preserve scenic and environmentally sensitive areas while making more land available for urban growth.

Such was the case with the Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002—a piece of legislation introduced by Reid—which dealt with a variety of boundary shifts and land trades in Nevada. Reid assured his colleagues that the bill was a bipartisan measure that would benefit both the natural environment and the economy in Nevada.

“What Reid did not explain,” the Los Angeles Times reported, “was that the bill promised a cavalcade of benefits to real estate developers, corporations and local institutions that were paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in lobbying fees to his sons’ and son-in-law’s firms.”

For example, the Howard Hughes Corporation alone paid $300,000 to the small, Washington-based consulting firm of Reid’s son-in-law, Steven Barringer, to promote a provision allowing Hughes to acquire 998 acres of highly valuable federal land situated in the rapidly growing Las Vegas metropolitan area. In federal lobbyist reports, Barringer is listed as one of Hughes’s representatives on the measure that Reid introduced.

Other provisions of the 2002 bill were intended to benefit (to the tune of several million dollars) a real-estate development headed by Harvey Whittemore, a senior partner in the Nevada law firm that employed all four of Reid’s sons. Specifically, Reid intervened to gain monumental government concessions on behalf of Whittemore, who wished to build thousands of homes and numerous golf courses on 43,000 acres of barren land in an area called Coyote Springs, an hour northeast of Las Vegas.

This land had a number of federal restrictions on its use: Most notably, one-fourth of it was off-limits to developers because of federal protections for an “endangered” species of desert tortoise that dwelt there; another one-fourth (about 10,500 acres) was government-owned and was subject to a federal power-line right of way; and the Coyote Springs territory as a whole was rife with streams and washes that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had designated as crucial to the health of the desert’s ecosystem, and was therefore generally off-limits to construction.

Thanks to Senator Reid’s intercession, however, the Bureau of Land Management agreed to relocate the “endangered” tortoises to an adjacent federal preserve, thereby opening that portion of Coyote Springs to developers. Further, Reid inserted some obscure provisions into a land-management bill that relocated the aforementioned power-line right-of-way corridor by moving it (at no cost to Whittemore) off of Whittemore’s property and onto what had theretofore been protected federal wilderness. According to the Los Angeles Times, “Power lines are not permitted on such [federal wilderness] land without congressional approval. In a flurry of technical language, Reid’s land bill changed the classification.”

At first, it seemed that these maneuvers by Reid would free Whittemore to build on the coveted 10,500-acre parcel previously held by Congress. But the Bureau of Land Management and the Senate’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee balked at the deal, and Reid backed away temporarily. Less than two years later, Reid tried allow Whittemore to purchase the Coyote Springs for $160,000—far below market value—but Congress again objected. Finally, Reid negotiated an alternate arrangement where Whittemore was permitted to purchase the land at a fair market rate while the government changed the placement of the corridor.

Between 2000 and 2006, Whittemore, his wife, and the Coyote Springs company gave Reid’s senatorial campaign and political action committees at least $45,000. According to the Los Angeles Times: “That included $35,000 for Reid’s leadership PAC, the Searchlight Leadership Fund, which helped him advance as a Senate leader. Most of that money was contributed in 2002 shortly after Reid introduced the Clark County land bill.” In addition, Whittemore gave $5,000 apiece to two of Reid’s sons, to finance their efforts to win local seats on the Henderson City Council and the Clark County Board of Commissioners, respectively. The developer also hired one of those sons as his personal lawyer to represent him in his dealings with federal officials.

Also profiting from the arrangement negotiated by Reid, which freed up tens of thousands of federal acres for development and annexation, were the governments of three large Nevada cities—Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, and Henderson. All three were represented by Reid’s family members—including his youngest son—who contacted the senator’s staff on behalf of their clients.

In September 2001, Reid, who candidly condoned lobbying by relatives—on the premise that lobbyists’ activities are “very transparent”—sent a letter to his staff explaining that the Senate Ethics Committee had advised him that there was no restriction against a relative lobbying a U.S. senator, and instructing his staff to treat his family members who were lobbyists no better or worse than any other lobbyist. But soon after the Los Angeles Times interviewed him in 2003 about about the lobbying activities his children had conducted during the previous year, Reid did an about-face and decided to ban relatives from lobbying his office. “Sen. Reid has long held that elected leaders must take steps to prevent even the appearance of impropriety,” his chief of staff said in a memo, “and it has become clear this ban is necessary for that reason.”

4. Influence-peddling in exchange for cash.

Between 2001 and 2004, Reid, in apparent violation of Senate ethics provisions, wrote at least four letters pressing the Bush administration to take action on certain issues of importance to Indian tribes that were clients of the notoriously corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who lobbied on behalf of tribes involved in the gambling casino industry. CBS News reports that “starting in the mid-1990s, he [Abramoff] became a master at showering gifts on lawmakers in return for their votes on legislation and tax breaks favorable to his clients.” Eventually Abramoff was convicted in federal court of corrupting public officials, tax evasion, and fraud, and he served three-and-a-half years in prison.

During the 2001-04 period, Abramoff’s staff was in regular contact with Reid’s office. Whenever Reid wrote a letter on behalf of the Indian tribes, he collected donations from Abramoff’s lobbying partners and clients around the same time period. All told, these donations totaled nearly $68,000. An Associated Press report provides the details:

While Abramoff never directly donated to Reid, the lobbyist did instruct one tribe, the Coushattas, to send $5,000 to Reid’s tax-exempt political group, the Searchlight Leadership Fund, in 2002. About the same time, Reid sent a letter to the Interior Department helpful to the tribe, records show.

Abramoff sent a list to the tribe entitled “Coushatta Requests” recommending donations to campaigns or groups for 50 lawmakers he claimed were helpful to the tribe. Alongside Reid’s name, Abramoff wrote, “5,000 (Searchlight Leadership Fund) Senate Majority Whip.”

Following a pattern seen with Abramoff and Republicans, Abramoff’s Democratic team members often delivered donations to Reid close to key events.

Reid himself, along with his Senate counsel Jim Ryan, met with Abramoff deputy Ronald Platt on June 5, 2001, “to discuss timing on [a] minimum wage bill” that affected the Marianas, according to a bill that Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff’s firm, sent the Marianas. Three weeks before the meeting, Greenberg Traurig’s political action committee donated $1,000 to Reid’s Senate re-election committee. Three weeks after the meeting, Platt himself donated $1,000 to Reid….

The Marianas, U.S. territorial islands in the Pacific Ocean, were one of Abramoff’s highest-paying clients and were trying to keep their textile industry exempt from most U.S. laws on immigration, labor and pay, including the minimum wage. Many Democrats have long accused the islands of running garment sweatshops. The islands in 2001 had their own minimum wage of $3.05 an hour, and were exempt from the U.S. minimum of $5.15.

Republicans were intent on protecting the Marianas’ exemption. Democrats, led by Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Rep. George Miller of California, wanted the Marianas to be covered by the U.S. minimum and crafted a compromise. In February 2001, Kennedy introduced a bill that would have raised the U.S. hourly minimum to $6.65 and would have covered the Marianas….

Within a month, Platt began billing for routine contacts and meetings with Reid’s staff, starting with a March 26, 2001 contact with Reid chief of staff Susan McCue to “discuss timing and status of minimum wage legislation,” the billing records say. In all, Platt and a fellow lobbyist reported 21 contacts in 2001 with Reid’s office, mostly with McCue and Ryan.

One of the Marianas contacts, listed for May 30, 2001, was with Edward Ayoob, Reid’s legislative counsel. Within a year, Ayoob had left Reid’s office to work for Abramoff’s firm, registering specifically to lobby for the islands as well as several tribes….

On March 5, 2002, [Reid] sent a letter to the Interior Department pressing the agency to reject a proposed casino by the Jena band of Choctaw Indians in Louisiana…. The Jena’s proposed casino would have rivaled one already in operation in Louisiana run by the Coushattas, and Abramoff was lobbying to block the Jena. The day after Reid’s letter, the Coushattas wrote a $5,000 check to Reid’s Searchlight group at Abramoff’s suggestion….

On Nov. 8, 2002, [Reid] signed a letter with California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein urging Interior Secretary Gale Norton to reject a proposal by the Cuyapaipe Band of Mission Indians to convert land for a health clinic into a casino in southern California. The casino would have competed with the Palm Springs gambling establishment run by the Agua Caliente, one of Abramoff’s tribes.

Two weeks later, Reid went to the Senate floor to oppose fellow Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s effort to win congressional approval for a Michigan casino for the Bay Mills Indians, which would have rivaled one already operating by the Saginaw Chippewa represented by Abramoff. “The legislation is fundamentally flawed,” Reid argued, successfully leading the opposition to Stabenow’s proposal.

The next month, Reid joined six other Democratic senators in asking President Bush in mid-December 2002 to spend an additional $30 million for Indian school construction. Several Abramoff tribes, including the Saginaw and the Mississippi Choctaw, were seeking federal money for school building.

Six weeks after that letter, three Abramoff partners—including Platt and Ayoob—donated a total of $4,000 to Reid’s Senate re-election campaign. Later in 2003, the Agua Caliente contributed $13,500 to Reid’s political groups while the Saginaw chipped in $9,000.

Reid sent a fourth letter on April 30, 2003, joining Ensign a second time to urge Interior to reject the Jena casino. Two months later, Abramoff’s firm threw a fundraiser for Reid at its Washington office that netted the Nevada senator several more donations from Greenberg Traurig lobbyists and their spouses. Ayoob was instrumental in staging the event, Reid’s office said.
Reid also sponsored a bill to give $100,000 to another tribe represented by Abramoff, because, said the senator, Louisiana lawmakers had sent him a letter requesting it.

5. Accepting illegal gifts.

Between 2003-05, Reid accepted free ringside seats for three professional boxing matches—seats worth between several hundred and several thousand dollars each—from the Nevada Athletic Commission. This occurred at a time when the Commission was trying to influence the senator on federal regulation of boxing. As the Washington Post explained, Reid had been “pressing legislation to increase government oversight of the sport, including the creation of a federal boxing commission that Nevada’s agency feared might usurp its authority.”

The Senate ethics manual warns against “accepting any gift where it appears that the gift is motivated by a desire to reward, influence, or elicit favorable action.” Reid’s explanation, as the Washington Post paraphrased it, was that he was “simply trying to learn how his legislation might affect an important home state industry.” “Anyone from Nevada would say, ‘I’m glad he is there taking care of the state’s number one businesses,’” Reid said.

6. Reid’s energy stocks.

In late 2005, Reid invested between $50,000 and $100,000 in the Dow Jones U.S. Energy Sector Fund, which held shares in several major oil companies. On the day Reid made his initial investment, the Fund closed at $29.15 per share. In August 2008, Reid sold some of his shares, whose value had climbed to $41.82. “Two months later,” reports RealClearPolitics.com, “Reid-supported legislation that would cost oil companies billions in taxes and regulatory fees passed. The Energy Sector Fund’s shares plummeted to $24.41 each.”

7. Promoting “Green Energy” to enrich his family.

In August 2012, the Las Vegas Review-Journal published a story about how Reid was strong-arming NV Energy, Nevada’s primary electricity provider, to buy more “green energy” from a Chinese solar company named ENN Mojave Energy LLC. This was occurring despite the fact that NV Energy had already exceeded its state-mandated quota for green energy (which generated higher electric bills for customers). “There’s another factor, however,” noted the Review-Journal, “one more personal to Reid: His son, Rory Reid, is one of the attorneys for the ENN Mojave Energy project…. [S]uccess for ENN in finding customers helps Rory Reid, and its failure could cost him a client.”

8. Quashing a federal investigation in exchange for money.

In January 2013, The Salt Lake Tribune reported that a wealthy Utah businessman named Jeremy Johnson was accusing Utah’s recently elected attorney general, John Swallow, of having helped broker a deal in 2010 — when Swallow was Utah’s chief deputy attorney general — in which Johnson “believed he was to pay Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid $600,000 to make a Federal Trade Commission investigation into Johnson’s company go away.” According to the Tribune, Johnson had made an initial payment of $250,000 toward that end. Johnson’s company was called I Works Inc., described by the Tribune as “the center of a host of companies that sells products under hundreds of different names.”

But after Johnson had made the aforementioned $250,000 payment, the federal government nonetheless filed a lawsuit against Johnson on December 21, 2010, alleging that the products sold by I Works Inc. included “make-money schemes,” “stay-healthy programs,” and information about government and private grants that supposedly could be used to pay off personal debts. Said the Tribune:

“After hundreds of thousands of customers sought refunds from credit card companies, claiming they were charged for unauthorized purchases, Visa and MasterCard fined I Works and the other companies and terminated many of their accounts, the complaint says. Johnson and others then created dozens of ‘shell’ companies to accept credit card payments in order to avoid fines and detection, it says.”

Johnson, who had been under the impression that his $250,000 down-payment was to have served as insurance against such a lawsuit, demanded that Swallow return some of that money to him. Johnson also said he was unsure if any of the money he had paid in the deal actually reached anyone connected to Senator Reid.

The Tribune provides additional key details about this scandal:

To back his allegations, Johnson provided an email from Swallow that Johnson identified as key in supporting his claims. Johnson also granted access to at least several dozen other emails, two financial records, several photos, and a transcript of about 60 pages of a secretly recorded April 2012 meeting Johnson had with Swallow…. The documents appear to support Johnson’s story that in 2010 Swallow brokered a deal between Johnson and Richard M. Rawle, owner of the Provo-based payday-loan company Check City, to enlist Rawle to use his influence to get Reid involved on behalf of Johnson and I Works…. Johnson said Swallow suggested Reid could make problems with regulators go away — for a price.

“I said, ‘OK, what do I need to do?’ He’s like, ‘OK, it costs money,’ ” Johnson said, who claimed Swallow was adamant he make a deal.

“I think he told me, ‘Richard Rawle has a connection with Harry Reid,’ ” Johnson said.

He said Swallow at first wanted $2 million to enlist Reid’s help. But I Works was no longer profitable and he did not have the money, Johnson said, so they eventually agreed on $300,000 upfront and $300,000 later.

Swallow put Johnson in contact with Rawle, whose company has operations in Nevada. Rawle … had contributed to Reid’s 2010 re-election bid and later bragged to Johnson that the Nevada Democrat helped him delay new federal payday-loan regulations, Johnson said.

On Sept. 29, 2010, Swallow sent an email to Johnson with the subject line “Mtg. with Harry Reid’s contact.” [Said the email:] “Richard [Rawle] is traveling to LV tomorrow and will be able to contact this person, who he has a very good relationship with. He needs a brief narrative of what is going on and what you want to happen. I don’t know the cost, but it probably won’t be cheap.”

On Oct. 7, Johnson emailed Rawle, insisting there was “rock solid proof” the FTC allegations against I Works were false. “We will do whatever it take[s] to get Senator Reid on our side and hopefully you can help make it happen. Let me know.”

They arranged an Oct. 9 meeting at Check City’s Provo headquarters. Johnson said he, Swallow and Rawle attended, along with at least two other people.

Five days later, on Oct. 14, Rawle registered a new company called RMR Consulting LLC with the state, Department of Commerce records show. On Nov. 2, an official with a Check City-related company called Softwise Inc. emailed Johnson, with a copy to Rawle: “We wanted to let you know that we have our people in Washington D.C. currently working with the FTC on your case. Also, the initial retainer of $50,000 can now be wired to RMR Consulting, LLC.” The writer provided an account number at Bonneville Bank.

A copy of I Works’ general ledger that same day shows $50,000 was paid to RMR Consulting for “legal fees.” Another $200,015 was paid Dec. 2.

But less than three weeks later, on Dec. 21, 2010, the FTC filed a lawsuit against Johnson, I Works and others in federal court in Las Vegas. The suit alleges illegal marketing and billing practices for online sales of kits and access to websites with information about such things as obtaining government grants for personal expenses and making money online. It also alleges Johnson created a number of shell companies whose connections to I Works were hidden so they could continue to bill customers after Visa and MasterCard threatened to cut him off because a large number of cardholders had reversed charges.

Johnson said he called Swallow and asked him why the lawsuit was filed after he had paid for it to go away. According to Johnson, Swallow told him it was because Johnson hadn’t paid the second $300,000 they had agreed on and that Reid believed he had the money….

Because the money he paid had done nothing for him and I Works, Johnson began a months-long effort to pressure Swallow and Rawle into returning at least some of the money, which Johnson had borrowed from a friend who also was an I Works executive.

In June 2011, Johnson was charged with a single criminal count of mail fraud and was arrested at the Phoenix airport while waiting to board a plane for Costa Rica, where he hoped to start a helicopter tourism business after I Works had been taken over by a court-appointed receiver and his assets were frozen. Johnson spent 96 days in jail until federal prosecutors relented and a judge granted bail of $2.8 million….

Just after Johnson’s release, and with Swallow a candidate for attorney general, Johnson said Swallow and his campaign consultant, Jason Powers, met him at a St. George hotel, where Johnson said he again pressured Swallow to come up with the money.

In 2013, Johnson said: “The truth is the worst thing I think I’ve done was I paid money knowing it was going to influence Harry Reid. So I’ve felt all along that I’ve committed bribery of some sort there.”

9. Reid’s donor & lobbyist friend goes to prison.

In September 2013, Harry Reid’s close friend and donor, the powerful multimillionaire lobbyist Harvey Whittemore—whom Reid assisted in the aforementioned Coyote Springs matter—was sentenced to two years in prison for having funneled more than $130,000 in illegal campaign funds to Senator Reid’s re-election committee in 2007. Convicted of three felonies, Whittemore was also fined $100,000 and ordered to perform 100 hours of community service.

10. Expediting Visa applications for foreign investors.

In January 2014, the nonpartisan government-accountability organization Cause of Action filed an ethics complaint accusing Reid of violating the Senate’s Code of Official Conduct by using his influence to help the politically connected, Las Vegas-based SLS Hotel & Casino—where the senator’s son, Rory Reid, and his law firm were legal counsel—get visas for approximately two-dozen Asian investors who were willing to help the hotel fund a major renovation project. Without the visa approvals, the investors would not be permitted to bring their money into the U.S.

Initially, in December 2012, career officials inside the Department of Homeland Security had ruled—in what is normally a non-appealable visa decision—that the SLS Hotel request failed to meet the criteria for expedited review. That prompted Reid to personally reach out to Alejandro “Ali” Mayorkas, the top official at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), to intervene. According to the Washington Times:

“The intervention from Mr. Reid’s staff was so intense at one point a year ago that a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) official reported that it prompted a phone shouting match…. Within a few short weeks of Mr. Reid’s personal intervention, the decision not to expedite the visas was reversed.”

11. Purchasing expensive gifts with campaign money.

In March 2014, it was reported that during the previous two years Reid’s political organization had paid Ryan Elisabeth Reid—the senator’s 23-year-old granddaughter who ran a jewelry and gift business—more than $31,000 ($14,481 in 2012 and $16,786 in 2013) for “holiday gifts” to be given to supporters and staff. This was almost 7 times more than the combined total that Reid spent on donor gifts from all other vendors.

Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations permit only the purchase of gifts of “nominal value” for occasions such as holidays, graduations, or weddings. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal: “Reid said the payments complied with federal law and [FEC] rulings that campaign finance experts say allow the purchase of goods from relatives if they meet a fair market value test. But the potential appearance that Reid could be using funds from political donors to enrich a family member prompted a decision [by Reid] to reimburse the campaign.”

12. Reid says horror stories about Obamacare are lies, spread by Koch brothers.

On February 26, 2014, Reid addressed the many news reports that had indicated, in recent months, that because of Obamacare many people had lost their previous insurance coverage, had lost access to the doctors they wanted, were burdened by much higher premiums and deductibles than ever before, and were unable to get the medical care they needed. Said Reid: “[T]here’s plenty of horror stories being told. All of them are untrue, but they’re being told all over America.” Those lies, he charged, were “being paid for” by “two billionaire brothers” who happened to be “oil magnates” — a reference to David Koch and Charles Koch, major funders of conservative causes.

Just hours later, after several Senate Republicans had mocked Reid’s assertion that criticisms of Obamacare were based on lies, Reid returned to the Senate floor to temper his earlier statement. “I can’t say that every one of the Koch brothers’ ads are a lie, but I’ll say this … the vast, vast majority of them are,” Reid declared.

That same day, in reaction to anti-Obamacare ads produced by an organization funded by the noted conservative philanthropists Charles and David Koch, Reid said of the Koch brothers: “It’s too bad that they’re trying to buy America, and it’s time that the American people spoke out against this terrible dishonesty of these two brothers who are about as un-American as anyone I can imagine.”

13. Reid says “the border is secure”.

As of July 2014, nearly 60,000 illegal-immigrant minors — mainly from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador, and mostly unaccompanied by parents or guardians — had crossed the border into the southern U.S. since October 2013, creating a massive humanitarian crisis. Government officials estimated that by the end of 2014, the figure would exceed 90,000, and that in 2015 it would top 140,000 — not including the many tens of thousands more who could be expected to avoid detection altogether. Nonetheless, Reid told reporters on July 15, 2014: “The border is secure. [Senator] Martin Heinrich talked to the caucus today. He’s a border state senator. He said he can say without any equivocation the border is secure.” “Remember,” Reid added, “had we done comprehensive immigration reform, we wouldn’t be having this issue.”

14. Reid’s discrimination against Asians and minorities.

At an Asian Chamber of Commerce gathering in Las Vegas on August 21, 2014, Reid stated: “The Asian population is so productive. I don’t think you’re smarter than anybody else, but you’ve convinced a lot of us you are.” After an attendee was introduced to the podium, Reid said: “One problem I’ve had today is keeping my Wongs straight.” In a statement subsequently provided by his office, Reid said: “My comments were in extremely poor taste and I apologize. Sometimes I say the wrong thing.”

15. Reid’s bodyguard attacks reporter for inquiring about his corruptions.

In October 2014, conservative author Jason Mattera caught up with Reid (who was walking down a hallway in the Capitol Building with several other men) and asked the senator, “How did you become so rich working in government?” When Reid continued walking and did not reply, Mattera followed up with: “How does someone on a government salary most of their career accumulate your type of wealth?” Reid again remained silent and kept walking. Then, one of the senator’s bodyguards suddenly asked Mattera, “Are you press?” before shoving him and then pinning him against a wall. After Mattera affirmatively identified himself as a member of the press, the bodyguard retorted, “I don’t care if you’re press or not.” When Mattera asked the bodyguard what his name was, the man refused to reply.

16. Reid blocks bills to satisfy donors.

During 2013-14, the Republican-led House of Representatives passed 387 pieces of legislation — more than 40 of which were designed to create jobs and grow the economy — that Reid either ignored or blocked from coming to a vote in the Democrat-led Senate, thereby preventing them from ever reaching President Obama’s desk. By contrast, only 63 Senate bills were not considered by the House. As Grover Norquist observed in U.S. News & World Report: “If gridlock does exist in Congress, it is a mostly one-way street with barriers erected at the doors of the Senate.”

17. References.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2282

Leaked memo shows Donald Trump’s landslide win in Florida

Leaked memo shows Donald Trump’s landslide win in Florida, a fiercely contested battleground state.

 

Florida-for-Trump1. Introduction.

A leaked internal memo (Aug 13, 2016) by Public Policy Polling, a left-wing outfit specializing in lots of push-polling and other Democrat electioneering disguised as opinion surveys, shows Donald Trump is winning by a landslide in Florida, in complete contrast to many published poll results, presumably including its own. It has been suspected all along that most, if not all, the pre-election polling conducted by the dishonest, corrupt mainstream media were intentionally biased. Fortunately, just as the collusion of the dishonest, corrupt mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, Politic0, Washington Post, etc.) with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was exposed by the leaked Wikileaks emails, their intentionally biased polling was also exposed by leaked internal memos, including one date Aug 13, 2016, that has never been intended to be released to the American public in its raw form.

Based on information from the leaked memo,  a record high of 91% of registered Republican voters versus a record low of 17% registered Democratic voters declare themselves as “likely” to vote in Election 2016, and Trump’s supporters gives him %80 approval level while Hillary’s supporters gives her only %17 approval level (See Question 12).

 

Florida-polling-results-for-Aug-10,-2016-to-Aug-15,-2016-

(Click to enlarge)

However, Published polling data for similar time period (Aug 10, 2016 to Aug 15, 2016) from Monmouth University shows Hillary leading 48 to 39, from CBS News/ YouGov shows Hillary leading 45 to 40, and Fox shows Hillary leading 45 to 44. Are these numbers authentic or fake? Please read the memo in its entirety, including the frantic comments from its author, and be your own judge!

 

(Click to enlarge)

 corrupt-mainstream-media-CNN-Clinton-News-Network corrupt,-traitorous,-Sharia-compliant-CNN-is-going-full-frontal-assault-on-Donald-Trump- dishonest,-traitorous,-Sharia-compliant-CNN-is-Muslim-propaganda-machine,-part-of-corrupt-mainstream-media Jeff-Bezos'-dishonest,-corrupt,-failing-Washington-Post-is-anti-Trump,-pro-globalists,-leftist-propaganda-

Dishonest, traitorous, anti-America, anti-Trump, pro-globalist, pro-Hillary CNN (aka Clinton News Network), part of the corrupt mainstream media, has strictly become the Muslim propaganda machine and the mouthpiece for the Islamofascists and the globalists.

 

2. Content of leaked memo.

*The only inputs from Freedom Post were video clips and comments inside red brackets < >.

 

Question 1: Do you approve or disapprove of President Barack Obama’s jobperformance?
Approve …….. …………………………………….. 10 %
Disapprove…………………………………………..81%
Not sure ………………………………………………..9%

 

Question 2: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton?
Favorable …………………………………………… 17 %
Unfavorable ……………………………………….. 64%
Not sure …………………………………………….. 19 %

 

Question 3: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump?
Favorable……………………………………………. 66 %
Unfavorable…………………………………………. 17 %
Not sure ………………………………………………. 17%

 

Question 4: Does a candidate’s poor handling of sensitive or classified information make you more or less likely to vote for them?

More likely………………………………………….. 14%
Less likely ………………………………………….. 74%
Wouldn’t make a difference …………………… 9%
Not sure ………………………………………………. 3%

 

Question 5: If a candidate were to come under indictment by the FBI for fraud, corruption, or even murder, would that make you more or less likely to vote for them?
More likely…………………………………………..24%
Less likely ………………………………………….. 73%
Wouldn’t make a difference …………………… 2%
Not sure ………………………………………………. 1%

 

Question 6: Where do you get your most trusted news?
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS …………………….. 13%
FOX …………………………………………………… 18%
Brietbart, HeatStreet, Weekly Standard, National Review…… 21%
InfoWars, News Max, World News Daily.. 48%

 

Question 7: Would you rather Sanders be the Democratic Nominee than Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton ……………………………………. 13%
Bernie Sanders…………………………….……… 72%
Not Sure …………………………………………….. 15%

 

Question 8: Should it be illegal to speak poorly about minorities, women, or Muslims even if one is allowed to speak badly of Whites, Muslims, or Men?
Should be Illegal ………………………………….. 32%
Should not be Illegal ……………………………. 47%
Not sure ……………………………………………… 21%

 

Question 9: Has political correctness gone too far in America?
Too far …………………………………………………. 7%
Not too far ………………………………………….. 21%
Not sure ………………………………………………. 8%
Refuse to answer ……………………….…….…. 64%

<Quite interesting answer! The majority of responders seem even less comfortable addressing political correctness in America than identifying themselves as Trump’s supporters>.

 

Question 10: The candidates for President are Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump, Libertarian Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein. If the election was today, who would you vote for?
Hillary Clinton……………………………………… 9%
Donald Trump …………………………………… 74%
Gary Johnson ………………………………………. 1%
Jill Stein ……………………………………………… 3%
Undecided …………………………………..…….… 6%

 

Question 11: If the election were held today, who do you think
would win?
Hillary Clinton…………………………………….. 70%
Donald Trump ……………………………………. 24%
Gary Johnson ………………………………………. 3%
Jill Stein …………………………………………….… 3%

<Proof that fake polls actually work by successfully convincing voters that Hillary Clinton is ahead while in reality her numbers are crashing (as displayed later)>.

 

Question 12: What is your approval level of [ Subject’s Candidate ]? (Numbers do not add to 100%)
Hillary Clinton…………………………………….. 17%
Donald Trump ……………………………………. 80%
Gary Johnson ……………………………………… 32%
Jill Stein ……………………………………………… 57%

 

Question 13: [For Hillary Voters] What most concerns you about Hillary Clinton?
Trust / Emails ………………………………………. 7%
Grating Voice ……………………………………… 31%
Probably Killed Some Guys…………………….. 9%
Robbed Bernie Sanders………………………… 21%
Health. She’s super sick! ………………..……. 32%

<More concerned with grating voice than trust issue or murder? This is what fundamentally wrong with, and characteristically common among, Hillary’s supporters, specifically, and leftist liberals, in general! A visible, appalling, sociopathic lack of empathy, moral standards & ethical priorities, and putting appearance over substance, words over actions, and verbal promises over proven track record>.

Hillary Clinton’s body counts continue climbing.

 

Question 14: In the 2012 presidential election, did you vote for Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?
Barack Obama…………………………………….. 47%
Mitt Romney………………………………………. 42%
Someone else/ Don’t remember ……………. 11%

 

Question 15: Would you describe yourself as very liberal, somewhat liberal, moderate, somewhat conservative, or very conservative?
Very liberal …………………………………………. 2%
Somewhat liberal ……………………………….. 19%
Moderate……………………………………………. 34%
Somewhat conservative……………………….. 36%
Very conservative ……………………………….. 10%

<%46 Floridians identify themselves as Conservatives, %34 as Moderates, and %21 as Liberals. Essentially, the %34 Moderates will determine the outcome of an election dynamics that is based on political spectrum>

 

Question 16: If you are a woman, press 1. If a man, press 2.
Woman ………………………………………………. 53%
Man……………………………………………………. 47%

 

Question 17: If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican, press 2. If you are an independent or identify with another party, press 3.
Democrat …………………………………………… 33%
Republican …………………………………………. 47%
Independent or other ………………………….. 20%

<Purple Florida is becoming a Red State>

 

Question 18: If you are Hispanic, press 1. If white, press 2. If African American, press 3. If other, press 4.
Hispanic ……………………………………………… 14%
White …………………………………………………. 65%
African-American ………………………………… 15%
Other……………………………………………………. 6%

<Representative of U.S. general population>

 

Question 19: If you are 18 -29 years old, press 1. If 30 -45 press 2. If 46-65, press 3. If you’re older than 65, press 4.
18 to 29………………………………………………. 12%
30 to 45………………………………………………. 20%
46 to 65………………………………………………. 41%
Older than 65 ……………………………………… 27%

<representative of U.S. general demographics, weighed for double national average (%27 vs %14 nationally) of ‘Older than 65’ cohort (retirees)>

 

Question 20: Mode
Phone ………………………………………………… 80%
Internet ……………………………………………… 20%

August 10-12, 2016.
Survey of 715 Florida voters.

<The sample size could be larger to stabilize correlation or increase predictive accuracy of the survey>

STRATEGY IMPLICATIONS: It is of paramount importance that the Hillary Clinton campaign continue to promote the narrative that Trump is or has reached terminal levels in polling. The only number in this survey going in the right direction is the belief that Mr. Trump will lose the election.

This, however, will not be sufficient if his voter’s morale and enthusiasm are high<Any demoralized Trump supporter spotted anywhere?>. As we have seen, purchasing ‘Republican Disapproval,’ both from former policy makers and from the ‘#NeverTrump’ press-faction continues to be effective in convincing voters that Mr. Trump could be dangerous <Likely not anymore after the leak!>.

Liberal/Democratic voters are fortunately immune to any negative information or evidence against Mrs. Clinton. Apparently her lack of honesty and corrupt nature are “factored in” to her support<Perhaps because Hillary Clinton and many of her supporters likely share common sociopathic traits, as previously described>. Our recommendations are to keep her out of the public eye as much as possible<good luck!> and, potentially, use a body-double for activities such as driving or climbing stairs<be careful, it’s getting into fraudulent territory> should these be in the public eye.
The Media is doing all it can to help Mrs. Clinton <At least CNN has confirmed, and so did the public with its eye> and, as such, Mr. Trump has had difficulties in promoting his message and brand but this cannot be reliably continued over the next three months <or two, or one … >.

 

Biased, corrupt CNN admits to being the biggest promoters of Hillary Clinton‘s campaign.

 

Dishonest, corrupt CNN & MSNBC timely cut reporters & guest speakers out of video feeds on live national TV to protect Hillary Clinton by suppressing the truth.

 

Visibly upset Donald Trump‘s supporter to CNN reporters: “I am a patriot and you are traitors!” Kissimmee, Florida. Aug 12, 2016.

 

It is our conclusion that a polling-driven narrative can only go so far with rallies, yard-signs, and digital media indicators, all of which show a substantial and even overwhelming body of support for Mr. Trump.

OTHER NOTES
§ While a candidate’s poor handling of sensitive information was an across-the-board detractor for Republicans and Independents, it actually made some Democrats more likely to vote for the candidate.

§ For FBI charges of corruption, theft, or even murder, this increased the candidates standing across Democratic voters. Being indicted by the FBI could be beneficial to Hillary for her base. <Birds of the same feather (or weasels of same fur?) flock together, indeed!>. It was, however, absolutely toxic for Independents<or any decent human beings>.

§ Low trust in traditional media is causing a shift in data-sources that is
going to fracture the narrative badly <as it should be!>.

CONCLUSIONS: We have a set of target sample-weights from NS that will meet the sponsor’s needs nicely. The question is going to be how far we can maintain this charade. It might be time to find other jobs

  1. Hillary’s popularity numbers have crashed to fatal levels at %17 (11% undecided).

  2. Trump’s approval has increased dramatically with working minorities. He is up 12 points with African Americans and 32 points with Latinos. For minorities without employment, he is still underwater but has improved by 8 points.

  3. Hillary’s emails continue to be the largest source of her trust issues as well as concerns about her failing health. However, the number one factor in her decline has been exposure to her at the DNC. <If so, why did her polls show a post-DNC bounce? Oh wait, nevermind>72% of Democrats and 93% of Republicans find her voice “grating.” Independents are split 64-36 against her<Maybe that’s why Bill tried to escape by sleeping through her speech?>.

Bill Clinton sleeps through Hillary Clinton’s speech at Democratic National Convention (DNC). Philadelphia. Jul 28, 2016.

4. Trump is expected to win the election by 94% of Democrats—but only 34% of Republicans believe Mr. Trump most likely to win due to media messaging <Apparently, even Democrats don’t believe the BS from Democrats-run media probably because they know their own crap too well>. Despite this, the enthusiasm for Mr. Trump is high with a record 91% of registered [Republican?] voters declaring themselves “likely” whereas a record low of 17% registered Democratic voters have declared themselves “likely” to vote in the next election <parallel with relative sizes of rallies and online participation. Average crowd size of Trump rallies is 10,000 to 20,000. That of Hillary is 200 to 1,000>.

 

3. Analysis.

The document shows planned, intentional manipulation of PPP pre-election poll, and that while the specific post-manipulation data from this survey are not yet known, the pre-manipulation, raw data indicate that Donald Trump’s numbers are rising substantially while those of Hillary Clinton are collapsing! 

Why the fake polls? The Islamofascists, the globalists, and their puppets, including Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, all enemies of America, want American patriots and Trump’s supporters to feel sufficiently discouraged and demoralized by the pre-election fake poll results, mistakenly thinking that their votes would not count nor make a difference when their candidate, Donald Trump, was already so far behind and not having any remote chance to win, so that they would not show up at the voting stations to cast their ballots for Donald Trump by Election Day on November 8, 2016.

Americans increasingly distrust dishonest, corrupt, agenda-filled mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, Washington Post, New York Times, Politico, Huffington Post, etc.) and start using alternative news sources  (Brietbart, HeatStreet, Weekly Standard, National Review, InfoWars, News Max, World News Daily, etc.) more and more.

How many times have Conservatives scratched their heads and wondered who on earth could possibly supported such a corrupt, immoral candidate like Mrs. Hillary Clinton with a horrendous track record and under multiple simultaneous FBI criminal investigations for U.S. Presidency? The answer is provided in this survey, indeed. It’s not due individual lack of intelligence, but a collective lack of a moral yardstick. It’s not due to the ignorance of facts and law & order, but rather the acceptance and approval of evilness and chaos. It’s not due to the lack of insights to higher principles, but rather the submissions to self-interests and the lowest common denominator.

The lies, deceptions, propaganda, fact-twisting, and mis-characterization spread by the corrupt, dishonest mainstream media have actually produced result for them by successfully convincing the Republican voters with their intentionally biased pre-election polls that their supporting candidate will not win. However, if the affected voters plan to cast their votes by November, as they most likely will based on the measured level of enthusiasm, regardless of the pre-election polls, neutral or biased, all indications point to a landslide win in Florida, traditionally a battleground state, or “Purple State”, by Donald Trump.

Contributed to the predicted overwhelming victory are Republican voters’ enthusiasm and Donald Trump’s operational preparedness, such as opening of 23 RNC “Victory Offices” (in the process of opening 25 field offices) in the Sunshine State, as part of his outreach effort to open field offices in all 50 states, including traditional Blue States, traditionally Democrats’ strongholds.

 

4. Conclusion.

Just as the “media message” and falsehood-spreading stratagems from the dishonest  pollsters and corrupt mainstream media hired by DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign have worked by successfully convincing the Republican voters that Hillary Clinton is winning the Presidential race, Donald Trump’s genuine and authentic messages have resonated with his supporters and substantially increased their loyalty and enthusiasm to elect him as the next President of the United States. With 29 electoral votes and as a battleground state, Florida can very well determine the outcome of perhaps the most critical election in U.S. history in the time of threatening global instability brought on by the globalists, Islamofascists, and their dhimmi minions.

5. Recommendations.

Donald Trump’s supporters can simply ignore the fake polls conducted by the dishonest pollsters as well as the falsehood constantly promulgated by the shamelessly corrupt, brazenly traitorous mainstream media while continuing listening, understanding, spreading, and explaining The Donald’s policies and messages to others still skeptical. Together, American patriots can energize, re-calibrate, and solidify their convictions of casting ballots for the right Presidential candidate, who is unequivocally and unquestionably Mr. Donald Trump by all contests. The honest doubters with morals, Independents, and former Bernie supporters, should understand that Donald Trump might or might not be the perfect candidate, but the alternative to a Donald Trump’s Presidency is a Hillary Clinton’s Presidency which is synonymous with the immediate or eventual destruction of America, and perhaps the world, just based on her own track record of following orders from the globalists and Islamofascists, creating and assisting ISIS that has tortured and killed millions of Christians, Yazadis, and non-Muslims in the Middle East, all in exchange for more wealth and power.

 

References

1. http://freedompost.org/traitor/muslim-bribes-to-clintons.html

2. http://freedompost.org/election/latinos-for-trump-latinas-for-trump.html

3. http://freedompost.org/election/taylor-swift-supports-donald-trump.html

4. http://freedompost.org/election/babes-for-trump-women-for-trump.html

5. http://freedompost.org/election/women-for-trump-babes-for-trump.html

6. http://www.freedompost.org/election/trump-girls-break-the-internet.html

7. http://freedompost.org/election/students-for-trump.html

8. http://freedompost.org/election/kids-for-trump.html

9. http://freedompost.org/islam/muslim-atrocities-worldwide.html (warning: graphic!)

10. http://www.freedompost.org/islam/muslim-animal-abuse-cruelty.html

11. http://freedompost.org/islam/deception/facts-many-syrian-refugees-are-isis-sympathizers.html

12. http://freedompost.org/muslim/invasion/hussein-obamas-syrian-widows-and-orphans.html

13. http://freedompost.org/muslim/infiltration/barack-hussein-obama-the-muslim-in-chief.html

14. http://freedompost.org/terrorism/obama-directly-responsible-for-san-bernardino-attack.html

15. http://freedompost.org/islam/deception/civilization-jihad-aka-stealth-jihad.html

16. http://freedompost.org/islam/immigration/muslim-immigration-hijrah-and-politics.html

17. http://freedompost.org/terrorism/muslim-terrorism-worldwide-2015.html

18. http://freedompost.org/islam/deception/islamophobia-is-an-oxymoron.html

19. http://freedompost.org/islam/deception/muslim-race-card.html

20. http://www.freedompost.org/islam/deception/islamic-propaganda-wahhabi-hate-filled-reading-materials.html

21. http://freedompost.org/muslim/infiltration/cair-exposed.html

22. http://freedompost.org/terrorism/muslim-brotherhood-terrorist-designation-act-of-2015.html

23. http://freedompost.org/traitor/philly-mayor-jim-kenney-sharia-compliant-dhimmi-muslim-ass-kisser.html

24. http://freedompost.org/traitor/justin-trudeau-another-muslim-useful-idiot.html

25. http://freedompost.org/traitor/bill-shorten-another-traitor-and-muslim-useful-idiot.html