Washington Post-Muslim propaganda I

1. The garbage, vomited out by Rick Noack, continues to stink …
Why do some countries welcome refugees, while others do everything they can to keep them out? <That’s easy! Countries run by realists and smart leadership keeps the Muzzy vermin out. Countries run by Libtards welcome the Muzzy Trojan horse, as if they have learned nothing from the overwhelming evidences, both internationally and in U.S.>
The reasons are many, but one stands out: demographics<oh really?>. In Germany, for instance, a rapidly aging population is becoming increasingly aware of the need to welcome foreigners <not really, it’s suicidal Merkel’s decision for the most part, just like the corrupted U.S. CONgress voted for the Iran Nuclear Deal while only %20 of the American public approved it>. Other countries, where the aging trend is much less severe, have fewer incentives to welcome newcomers <wrong! Hungry, Czechoslovakia, Poland, where aging trend was not much different that of Germany, but these countries have smart and realistic leadership with foresight, seeing what kind of hell hole Europe would turn into with the onslaught of Muzzy vermins>.

A closer look at the following maps, which compare demographic trends across Europe between 2001 and 2011, helps explain some of the reasons Europe is so divided on how to deal with refugees. The maps not only offer explanations: They also show which nations might be missing out on an opportunity for future growth. <ugh, and how has this part of Middle East grown in the last 50 years, 100 years, 1,000 years, with all these vermins, even with the help of oil? How have they fared against other nations like Germany, Japan that have been devastated by the world wars? Yep, a lot of “missing out” alright, on beheading, murders, rapes, “honor-killings”, inbreeding, camels’ urine drinking, goat fornicating, perhaps so much so that the wealthy Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emigrates) wanted none of their own kind?>

 

… explain the country’s enthusiasm for helping today’s refugees. But there is another factor that few would openly acknowledge right away: Germany really needs them <no, it doesn’t!>

“What we’re experiencing right now is something that will occupy and change our country in the coming years <Yay!>. We want this change to be positive <Good luck! The odds are actually overwhelming against that, if history, both recent and ancient, is any indication>,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Monday. <Angela Merkel is the female version of Hitler who,  instead of waging wars with other countries like Hitler did, would do just the opposite, committing national suicide of the Germanic people, killing her own countrymen, women, along with their national heritage and culture>.

She was referring to a popular argument in the country’s discourse on immigration in recent months: Germany is shrinking rapidly, and the trend is expected to get worse in the coming years. By 2060, there will be only about 68 million to 73 million people in Germany, according to current predictions by the country’s statistical office — compared with about 81 million now.
Already today, Germany lacks young, skilled workers. Companies are unable to fill hundreds of thousands of jobs because they cannot find enough applicants <. On Sunday, Dieter Zetsche, the head of car manufacturer Daimler, said in a newspaper interview: “Most refugees are young, well educated and highly motivated <ugh, the reality (video below) shows otherwise>. Those are exactly the people we’re searching for <take all you want for your factory but be ready for your daughter to be raped and your head to be on the fence shortly>.”

European Muslims are indeed on average eight years younger than the rest of the population <and 150 times more violent>, a Pew Research Center study found. Daimler and other companies now want to search for applicants in refugee reception centers to fill their vacancies. Meanwhile, a first job portal has been launched on a Web site that is supposed to connect refugees with potential employers <Goodluck! considering most of these lazy, freeloading, Muzzy parasites come to Germany not for jobs but for free handouts and welfare benefits. Netherlands reduced benefits %50 and number of refugees dropped %30>.

The influx of refugees could also benefit German society as a whole <sure if the rapes, murders, freeloading, economic parasitism are considered benefits>. The country’s welfare system — one of the world’s most generous — is increasingly strained because more retirees have to be financed by fewer working-age and tax-generating citizens <and supporting the freeloading, economic parasites who refuse to work will reduce the strain?>. Today, there are three working-age Germans per retiree. By 2060, however, that ratio will be less than 2 to 1 <and it is better to support freeloading, economic parasites who refuse to work will not affect the ratios?> , according to the European Commission. In a recent op-ed, Astrid Ziebarth of the German Marshall Fund, a think tank, called Germany’s response to the refugee crisis “as pragmatic as idealistic.” Many Germans might support the influx of refugees for moral reasons right now <many more are against it>, but economic reasons might become a bigger part of the political debate in the future  when the challenges of the sudden increase in immigrants become more apparent <economic reasons due to substantially reduced economic productivity and straining of resources in addition to massive terrorism, “honor-killings”, and rapes brought about by these violent thugs, rapists, and freeloading economic parasites would be challenges to any sane country>.
Sweden takes in many refugees, but for different reasons

Such economic thinking makes Germany distinct from Sweden, which has recently taken in the highest number of refugees in Europe per capita, despite having a population that isn’t declining. Its government has historically been among the world’s most accommodating when it comes to refugees <and paying a heavy prices for this particular group of so-called immigrants>, which explains Sweden’s quick reaction in the current crisis. Although the Swedish government allows asylum-seekers to work immediately, chances of finding a long-term job are low. Nearly half of all foreign-born people ages 25 to 64 are unemployed <…. and on welfare, of course! Great for national suicide!>.

“There just aren’t many jobs anymore for the very low-skilled <nor for those economic parasites who do not want to work>,” Tino Sanandaji, a Swedish economist with the Research Institute of Industrial Economics, was quoted as saying by Al Jazeera English. In contrast, most unfilled jobs in Germany are offered by technical manufacturers and do not require previous knowledge because workers will be taught in apprenticeship programs. Whereas Germans are particularly looking for engineers and workers with technical skills, many Swedish job vacancies require either European higher education degrees or excellent knowledge of the Swedish language.

Britain already has one of Europe’s most diverse and stable populations
Britain is among Europe’s demographic exceptions: It is predicted to become Europe’s most populous country by 2060 thanks to immigration and fertility rates that are higher than most of its neighbors, according to the European Commission.

Despite Germany’s efforts to attract foreigners and Britain’s reluctance to do so, current forecasts predict a migrant proportion of 14 percent for Britain, but only 9 percent for Germany by 2060. In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has recently focused on a resettlement program for 20,000 additional refugees that would allow in some of the weakest <while evicting the native Britons, mostly the elderlies and retirees, to make rooms for those economic parasites, jihadists, thugs, rapists, and terrorists. Great idea!>. British commentators have said this strategy puts moral considerations over economic interests <more like corruption over integrity. Where is the moral consideration Muslim pandering to get votes and financial backing at the expense of abusing your own taxpaying citizens, jeopardizing the future of their offspring, and changing the face of U.K forever for the worst?>, obviously referring to Germany.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel says Europe must implement a joint system for dealing with migrants and agree to quotas

Meanwhile, the country is on persistently high alert: In Paris and in the rest of the country, police officers and soldiers patrol the streets to prevent potential terror attacks. January’s attacks <among many!> targeting a Jewish supermarket and editors critical of Islam have not helped to bridge the rift between France’s growing immigrant population and its white majority. Although only 7.5 percent of the French population is Muslim <and %75 in 50 years if the trend continues>, conservative politicians are worried about changes in demographics: Jean-Francois Cope, who later became the president of France’s major UMP party, said in 2012: “There are areas where children cannot even eat their ‘pains au chocolat’ because it’s Ramadan.” Cope was referring to a story about a non-Muslim child whose chocolate pastry was snatched during the Muslim month of fasting.

Being confronted with such provocative statements, President François Hollande continued to follow the country’s guidelines to regard all citizens as equal. What might sound like a logical and supportive idea has worrying implications. Many French migrants feel neglected by the country’s government because the “all citizens are equal” approach has until recently limited most affirmative action programs. Such programs, which are common in the United States, would be necessary to help sons and daughters of migrants escape poverty and job discrimination. France, however, does not collect data on its citizens’ race, ethnicity or religion, which has made it difficult to prove discrimination.

However, smaller studies have shown that applicants with foreign-sounding names <and with tendencies for violence, periodically pointing their asses upward, and randomly screaming “Allahu Akbar” even when not killing people> have much lower chances of getting jobs, and another survey documented a feeling among many children of immigrants that they are not considered as French by others <by refusing to assimilate. That is strange, how?>.

In France, it might be not so much the absence of migrants that is a threat to its future, but rather the government’s difficulties in finding a way to assimilate and support a large share of the country’s neglected population. All this explains why the French willingness to accept more refugees will likely remain fairly limited.

Hungary — and much of eastern Europe — is missing out on a demographic opportunity <LOL, missing out on committing national suicide is more like it!>
Contrary to France, many Eastern European countries face a population decline <population decline is not that big an issue like Muslim propagandists like yourself make it out to be>. Nevertheless, they refuse to take in more refugees <what wise countries!>. Hungary, which has recently built a border fence, has become the most prominent case: The country’s prime minister claimed last week that he was defending European Christianity against a Muslim influx. “Everything which is now taking place before our eyes threatens to have explosive consequences for the whole of Europe,” he wrote in the op-ed. “We must acknowledge that the European Union’s misguided immigration policy is responsible for this situation.” <what a wise man!>

The country’s demographic decline, however, could also be considered critical: By 2030, Hungary’s population will have decreased by 5.8 percent. The country is among Eastern Europe’s most rapidly shrinking nations. Others are performing even worse: Demographic research institute Infostat recently concluded that Slovakia was rapidly aging and concluded its society had “to be prepared for … the integration of a higher number of foreigners (often from very different cultures).” In recent days, Slovakia made headlines for exactly the opposite approach: It publicly announced it would accept only Christian refugees — no Muslims. Other countries with similar demographic forecasts, among them Estonia and Bulgaria, also want to limit the influx of Muslim refugees <apparently, these wise nations with self-respects, admirable cultural and historical heritages, and strong Christian foundations seem not corrupted like those in Western Europe>.

There might be reasons for such thinking: high unemployment and weak economic performance, for instance. Academically, there’s no consensus on whether population growth always leads to economic growth <it’s been historically proven that the economic growth and prosperity of a society depends on quality, not quantity, of its citizen. For example, India with 2nd largest world population versus Israel or Netherlands>. However, Eastern Europe’s policies will not simply be forgotten: Countries like Hungary and Slovakia probably won’t attract many Muslim migrants in the future, even if they should suddenly realize they urgently need younger foreigners <and the wise leaders of these countries are serving the true interests of their nations and citizens by acting with wisdom and responsibility, not corruption>.

2. Comment section

Public opinion in the comment section is telling ….

 

drgene1
9/8/2015 1:18 PM EDT
“Demographic opportunity”? Are you nuts? This is a Muslim invasion. Stop calling these folks Refugees. As the President of Hungary has noted:if they were real refugees, instead of economic freeloaders, they would stop and reside in the first country that admits them. They don not do so. They want the goodies of Germany. And Merkel, contrary to the Will of the German People, wants 800,000 of them–and more to come.
This is Suicidal Insanity. Why should Christian Europe embrace Muslims fleeing Muslim vs Muslim wars? Islam is the root of this chaos. Let Muslims bear the fruits of what they have sown.
MaryamtheProud
9/8/2015 4:16 PM EDT
They’re also mainly MEN, not the women and children in large numbers you’d see with genuine refugees.
Jerry_J
9/8/2015 3:05 PM EDT
“Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide,” wrote James Burnham in his 1964 “Suicide of the West.”Burnham predicted that the mindless magnanimity of liberals, who subordinate the interests of their own people and nations to utopian and altruistic impulses, would bring about an end to Western civilization.Was he wrong? Consider what is happening in Europe.Serbia, Hungary and Slovakia, small nations sensing they will be swamped by asylum seekers from the Muslim world, are trying to seal their borders and secure their homelands.Their instinct for survival, their awareness of lifeboat ethics, is acute. Yet they are being condemned for trying to save themselves.

Meanwhile, the pope calls on Catholics everywhere to welcome the asylum seekers and Angela Merkel will be taking in 800,000 this year alone, though the grumbling has begun in Bavaria.

This is but the beginning of what is to come, if Europe does not pull up the drawbridge.

The scores of thousands of migrants bursting into Europe and the hundreds of thousands and millions coming after them are going to force Europeans to address an existential question.

Who are we? Are we unique and separate peoples of a particular race and tribe, history and faith, language and culture, identifiable to all the world and worth preserving at the price of our lives?

Are we Germans, Russians, Poles, Italians, Spanish and French first?

Or are we simply Europeans, people who live on the world’s smallest continent and share a belief in the equality of all peoples and cultures, and in secularism and social democracy?

Liberal Man almost alone excepted, every species of animal life reacts or recoils when another species intrudes upon its turf.

Thus, in the end, Burnham was probably right.

sullivan2day
9/8/2015 9:45 PM EDT
In this badly overpopulated world, there is nothing wrong with a shrinking population.
15 4:31 PM EDT
Why doesn’t Saudi Arabia or one of the Stan countries take these people in? They’re all Muslims. Ready for Friday prayers and female subjugation. And let’s not forget – crash a few planes, shoot up a train, shoot up a newspaper, stab a teacher in the rest room … You know – the religion of peace. Or pieces – as in body parts.
Jerry_J
9/8/2015 3:04 PM EDT
The scores of thousands of Syrians in the Balkans, Hungary, Austria and Germany are only the first wave. Behind them in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan are 4 million refugees from the Syrian civil war. Seeing the success of the first wave, they are now on the move.Behind them are 2 million Alawites and 2 million Christians who will be fleeing Syria when the Bashar Assad regime falls to ISIS and the al-Qaeda terrorists who already occupy half of that blood-soaked land.Now the Iraqis, who live in a country the prospects for whose reunification and peace are receding, have begun to move. Also among the thousands pouring into Europe from Turkey are Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Afghans. When the Americans leave Afghanistan and the Taliban take their revenge, more Afghans will be fleeing west.Africa has a billion people, a number that will double by 2050, and double again to 4 billion by 2100. Are those billions of Africans going to endure lives of poverty under ruthless, incompetent, corrupt and tyrannical regimes, if Europe’s door remains wide open?
What is coming is not difficult to predict.Europe is going to run out of altruism long before it runs out of refugees. For as The New York Times reported Monday, there is no end in sight to the coming Third World and Islamic migrations to Europe.
If Europe does not seal its borders, what is to stop the Islamic world and Third World from coming and repopulating the continent with their own kind, as the shrinking native populations of Europe die out?

Will Old Europe even be recognizable by mid-century?

Publicus
9/9/2015 4:11 PM EDT
What I find fascinating about this whole “refugee” crisis is the short term historical memory being displayed by the EU elites. The former communist bloc countries that want nothing to do with quotas or admitting these “refugees” have first-hand experience with the effects of minority groups of different ethnicity. Doesn’t anyone remember how Nazi Germany used all of the German volksdeutsche living in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, etc. to destabilize and eventually overrun those countries in that little brouhaha called World War II? Orban is correct – these Muslim “refugees” are a Trojan Horse of potentially fatal proportions. If Germany is content to destroy itself demographically and ethnically because it can’t get its young people to have families, it has no right to foist that folly onto other countries. The same folly exists in bring them to the USA – we have nothing in common with these people ethnically, religiously or politically. Look at the terrorists being bred in the Somalis that were resettled in and around Minneapolis. Make them fight for their own countries instead of expecting economic benefits we don’t give to our own citizens.
CFL
9/8/2015 10:03 PM EDT 
Europe is playing with real fire. Germany is allowing 800,000 refugees per year. Now, that is a lot of Arabs flooding your culture. They will not assimilate the culture of the host country as has been proven in France and Britain where there has been a steady flow of Muslim migration. My guess is that there will be a back lash in Germany if the government proceeds with its refuge’s plan.
beekeeper6
9/8/2015 4:09 PM EDT
“Most refugees are young, well educated and highly motivated. Those are exactly the people we’re searching for.”A little bit later:“Nearly half of all foreign-born people ages 25 to 64 are unemployed. ‘There just aren’t many jobs anymore for the very low-skilled,’ Tino Sanandaji, a Swedish economist with the Research Institute of Industrial Economics, was quoted as saying by Al Jazeera English.”So wait a second, are they well educated or not? Something does not compute here.
ArmenTanzerian
9/9/2015 4:46 PM EDT
“Most refugees are young, well educated and highly motivated. Those are exactly the people we’re searching for.” Where the heck did he get THAT?
Corvus84
9/9/2015 3:57 PM EDT
This map does not “explain” that premise at all. In fact, all it shows is that there is little correlation, at all, with age demographics and tolerance for migrants. Both Germany and Hungary are “brown”, as are the Balkans, but the fact that this destroys the hypothesis is brushed away by saying “those other countries are dumb”. Is Ireland the most welcoming to asylum seekers and Portugal the least? Hardly. In fact, the areas of Germany that are notoriously the most intolerant of Islamic populations are located in East Germany, which has the most rapidly declining population. The hidden premise here, as is so popular among many new-to-the-show commentators on immigration, is that sensible people in areas of declining population should welcome migrants because they are a natural boon to demographic/economic development. This is not always the case in the 21st century.
tohbi
9/8/2015 9:21 PM EDT 
The muslim religion is violent. it seeks domination over all other religions by violence if necessary. “when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them…” quran 47. Europe is heading toward real trouble.
jkk1943
9/8/2015 5:02 PM EDT 
Amazing how the author could produce such an otherwise excellent piece without mentioning the “elephant” in the room- radical islam. The French, The Dutch and the British have had difficulty with their restive Muslim immigrant populations. Many Muslims initially welcome the refuge offered by the West but never fully integrate into open, diverse and very secular western societies. Many are poorly educated, fail to learn the language of the host country and wind up chronically unemployed. This creates a fertile ground for terrorism recruitment. This is an issue no one wants to talk about which is unfortunate and cowardly.
lgp2112
9/9/2015 1:26 PM EDT
When Islam began, it was born into the Roman world which was tolerant of Christians, Jews and a host of other Religious affiliations. There were great city’s in Egypt present day Turkey and yes Syria. In North Africa you had Carthage which was full of believe it or not Germans. Their was trade all around the Med. and with China. Then Islam came! Guess what happened? 1700 years of Rape and Murder tearing down what took thousands of years to build. Yeah they are tolerant all right. If you have a history of a couple of thousand years of brutality against Christians I just don’t see them changing overnight. I think what they will do is live off the taxpayer and when their numbers are great enough they will go on Jihad.
Weebly
9/9/2015 10:17 AM EDT
Why aren’t any of the refugees making their way to the super wealth Muslim gulf states where they would also be culturally compatible? Why are there no expectations for Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, etc. to give asylum?
jerryc465
9/8/2015 8:43 PM EDT
As if Germany will get young skilled workers out of these people…More likely radical problems. I hope Obama doesn’t bring a bunch of them here. We already do our part with all the people fleeing tyranny in Central America, etc.
CBrin
9/8/2015 5:29 PM EDT
This article may also partially explain why the average American is so reluctant to receive many refugees. We already get and have them! The US population has doubled in the last 50 years, which is not explained by fertility rates. Add that to we have received millions and millions of persons who were and are not self-supporting and require special education assistance. We should be discerning when receiving persons who unfortunately have contributed much to the security apparatus and measures we live in. Lastly, we need to assimilate the millions of people that we have recently received. So, Obama may want to dish Merkel out of a hole that she dug, I say no. He will not cut a personal check, he will cut a check that we will all pay.
Carol_R
9/8/2015 5:40 PM EDT
The U.S. should only accept those Syrians who are being persecuted such as the Christians.
hamlet21
9/8/2015 3:52 PM EDT
So here we are with an epidemic problem of Muslims looking for Christian Europeans to take them into the fold and you can bet they will be looking for free housing, food, clothing, education and medical treatment. Meanwhile all the filthy rich middle eastern nations of Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain remain SILENT and offer NOTHING. Where is OBAMA on this one? 
realityboy
9/8/2015 3:52PM EDT
Why is all this talk about Europe? Why is his Europe’s problem? The rich Arab countries, including and especially Saudi Arabia have admitted zero refugees.
Until The Saudis, Kuwait, UEA, Qatar etc. do their part, Europe should cease all commerce with these states. Better yet, load the refugees into boats and unload them in countries which are much better suited to accommodating their beliefs and customs.
Hans-Joachim_Zierke
9/9/2015 2:30 PM EDT
“This map helps explain why some European countries reject refugees, and others love them” Does it? Dear Washington Post staff, have a look at your own map. When looking at Germany, the population losses happen mostly in East Germany. So, by your logic, the East of Germany would have to welcome refugees with special sympathies.
But the facts are, that people in East Germany are far more skeptical. Yes, there are thousands of people as well, who volunteer, who help, who welcome those people, but if you do a little research or look at the polls, the difference is just the opposite.Face it: Human beings are slightly more complicated than mathematics with economic interests.

ArouetSpeaks
9/8/2015 10:27 PM EDT
Premise is wrong. Declining population is a boon to environment and quality of life, especially in the coming age of robot helpers. It’s not just about GDP. Europe has no business importing the Sunni population bomb, any more than we should import the Papist Latino population bomb. By taking migrants in, the Euros create incentives for more to come. Two thousand five hundred years of successfully fighting off Phoenicians, Persians, Carthaginians, Arabs, Mongols and Turks undone by the Holocaust guilt riddled conscience of the Alemannic tribes. Mindless!
conrad1997
9/8/2015 9:20 PM EDT
One important the fact the writer omitted or really never knew. Hungary was occupied by the Ottoman Empire i.e. the Muslim world for 150 years. By the time the western armies kicked them they have murdered or carried away to slavery half the population.

When Budapest was liberated, the western armies found everything and everybody was carted away into the Belly of the Ottoman empire. For years there was very little of the newly arriving people who could speak Hungarian.
These Muslims arriving like locusts are the descendants of the Syrian, Afghans, Iraqis that were part of the destroying ottoman armies.Hungary was one of the largest, highest populated, wealthy states in Medieval Europe. By the time the Muslims were kicked out there was no much left.Hungarians do remember that.If they need workers, I am sure they can recruit from other parts of the world.

The Ottoman empire did not reach Britain, France, the German states. They can than the Hungarians among other East Europeans for that.

eeterrifio
9/8/2015 4:53 PM EDT
The Balkan states and Hungary still remember occupation by the Ottoman empire….
q90019
9/8/2015 4:12 PM EDT
I don’t know why there is this angst over shrinking population <It’s mostly agenda from Muzzies and and their collaborators>. One reads about increasing automation that within a generation menial jobs will be taken over by computers and robots, so what will you then do with this surplus of people? Plus less people puts less stress on the environment and demand for resources.
2015 4:07 PM EDT
So, Europeans are supposed to trade off supposed growth from a younger workforce for the likelihood that those young workers will be Muslims who will impose Muslim law and customs on Europeans? Seems like a lousy trade off to me. Just look at what countries such as Denmark and Sweden are getting–young men who have made rape of Scandinavian women an everyday occurrence.
Charles Edward Brown
9/8/2015 1:12 PM EDT
These migrants will get old too and further drain social programs <draining on social programs will happen immediately, and for decades to come, if the past is any indication, because these freeloading economic parasites do not want to work, besides contributing to substantial security cost due to their violence!>. Germany is making a HUGE mistake. Future terrorists will be coming from Germany. Young Muslims should be asked to give up Islam if they want to stay.
Anton von Papen
9/10/2015 7:31 AM EDT
What a pile of nonsense. I will not comment on this terrible article, I will just ask one simple question. If Germany needs foreign workers, why did she had restrictions on employment for other EU members and why didn’t Germany receive 2 million of Ukrainian refugees, who would integrate in society with no problems?
Lucian Nicolae Zsiga
9/14/2015 3:10 PM EDT
they had massive restrictions for romanian and bulgarian citizens that they finnaly lifted after 7… (seven!) years since the these two countries joined the EU… and if they want cheap work force how come they refuse people from the balkans, like serbs and bosniaks? it’s all some politically correct mambo jambo that will explode in their face… http://www.dw.com/en/eu-opens-doors-to-romanian-and-bulgarian-workers/a-17335948
Matt;s brother
9/9/2015 3:35 AM EDT
It is not strange that rich Middle East countries like Saudi Arabia will not allow refugees from neighboring countries to come into their countries. They are afraid that those rivers of refugees will be loaded with radical Islamic terrorists that will cause havoc in their own Muslim countries. Instead, well meaning European countries will naively allow this influx of mixed refugees into their countries and will forever pay the price for their kindness. Sadly, it is often those who received kindness who become terrorists in the very countries that saved them. Case in point were the USA’s Boston Bomber Tsarnaev brothers who’s families were refugees from Chechnia. The murderous brothers enjoyed scholarships and a bounty of kindness from the USA who allowed them and their family into this country as refugees only for this family repay the USA hospitality with murder and terrorism. Meanwhile, the criminal mother of these two murderous brothers fled from her crime spree in the USA and spat insults at the USA who saved her family when they were refugees. It is easy to critisize European nations for not being more sensitive about these refugees from Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan, but we can be sure without a doubt that within this massive flow of middle eastern refugees is an army of radicalized Muslims that will surely leave their mark of terrorism and murder in the very countries that host their escape from the toilet bowl countries from which they flee.
toto21
9/8/2015 8:54 PM EDT
I really don’t buy the theory that current demographics are guiding the policies of European nations. Germany’s population loss is concentrated in the former East Germany. It stands to reason that after the fall of communism, many in that former Soviet colony sought better opportunities elsewhere. In southeastern Europe, there is the history of a period of Ottoman rule. The refugees are as likely to become an economic liability as an asset. So, why should countries look on them as some sort of investment in the future? The most generous countries have more prosperous economies and were never on the front lines in the millennium long struggle with Islam. It’s complicated. And the future is likely to be complicated, regardless of the fine motivations of the compassionistas interested only in moving as many refugees as possible through the system. One of the refugees interviewed on NPR today was a draft dodger from Syria. Lots of these men don’t want to face ISIS, so Russia realizes they have to get more involved to save their client state. And the migrants – which most of them are, not really refugees – are coming from a lot more places than Syria. This is a big wave that is not likely to stop because Europe lacks the ability to face the reality that is swallowing them whole. Globalization is now a two way street and all the dislocation that modernization brings to indigenous economies in poor countries is coming to knock on the door. Europe is only going to get poorer and more chaotic for the foreseeable future.
Harbie
9/8/2015 6:31 PM EDT
Unfortunately this massive migration amounts to the transplantation of unviable cultures into Europe. These people have left the rubble, ruin, conflict and intolerance of tribal Islam behind but could very well revive it once anchored in European cities. What is the guarantee they will assimilate, intermarry or even convert? Existing cultural patterns are to pick brides from the homelands and bring tribal relatives to settle in enclaves. 
8/2015 5:30 PM EDT 
Leave out the liberals. I am a liberal, but I think the European nations that are accepting tens of thousands of refugees are lighting a delayed fuse for themselves that will explode in their faces. Jihadists are no doubt hiding among some of these Muslim refugees. Every commenter who shames the nations who that exclude these refugees should be asked, are you taking a family into your home, how many families is your immediate neighborhood taking in? I assure you many of these holier-than-thou pontificators will find excuses to not take families in, while they
try to shame others into doing so.
8/2015 5:18 PM EDT
Are many of these refugees good hard working people? Of course they are.But the unavoidable truth is that Islam, ESPECIALLY the strain from Arab countries and the Middle East, is nothing but trouble. Just look at all the other countries in the region. These are their brethren. Women getting raped and children getting slaughtered, and they don’t give a crap. All they do is complain about why WE are not doing anything. They have no sense of community, ownership of a nation, or civic development. Its just tribal and religion, and that’s it.You liberals out there can call me all the names that you want. The more they are contained to their country, the better off the rest of the world is. You know I am right. Its ugly to say out loud, but everyone knows its true. That’s just the plain truth. Give them some bread and soup, a blanket and a roof over their head, and once they are well rested, they are back to chanting “Death to America, and the western world!” Just because they are suffering, doesn’t meant that they are good people, or that they are our friends. A dying man will say anything.The Germans may have bleeding hearts now, but I GUARANTEE YOU they will regret these moves 5 years from now. Native taxpaying Germans will hate them, and they won’t leave. It will be civil unrest that just unfairly makes the Germans look racist again.

beekeeper6
9/8/2015 4:11 PM EDT
This would all be great if the refugees actually were going to integrate and contribute to the European societies, but history has not shown this to be the case. In many Western European countries there are huge swaths of segregated ghettos where unemployed immigrants keep to themselves.
MaryamtheProud
9/8/2015 4:36 PM EDT
…  Arab Muslims RULED part of what is now Spain for centuries. Considering that these modern day refugees can’t even rule their own countries, why would anyone think they’d be good citizens of their adopted countries?
9/8/2015 3:59 PM EDT
The author did not mention that England – where all the migrants to Britain want to be – already has the highest population density in Europe, thanks to a huge influx of migrants over the last 10 years or so. The rising birthrate is driven by the Moslem minority, and a large percentage are living at least partially on benefits – no help at all to funding the state.Like France, in some English cities there are Moslem “areas” where others are not welcome. Not a good outlook for the future at all.
YankeesFan
9/8/2015 3:35 PM EDT
How long did the European socialist states think that they could have their gold-plated welfare states (where work is generally optional) without the 3rd world figuring out that if they could get there, they too could have a life of leisure?
THEN these European dummies pretty much shutdown their militaries and now they’re faced with an invasion that they can’t handle..
And BTW, see any future scenarios for the US?
Keep electing Democrat Euro-wannabes and you too can look forward to living in a third world sh*thole.
Life’s tough. It’s tougher when you’re stupid
9/8/2015 3:26 PM EDT
It’s a nice idea for today but I think it’s a huge long term mistake.
Muslims simply will not blend in peacefully with Christians. Their religion simply won’t tolerate such inclusiveness.
Tom Kitta
9/8/2015 1:28 PM EDT
Its not about numbers its about quality of immigrants. Western Europe drive to get more has little to do with demographics and all to do with political stance.Who cares if we get 1 million people if almost none of them work? Germany may need skilled workers for her industry but almost none of the refugees qualify as skilled nor have shown much desire to become skilled.Central Europe (as Eastern Europe is Ukraine and Belarus and Russia – not in EU) cannot economically afford to take on refugees as it has already a lot of non-working people.The country that got immigration right in the region is Russia, with second only to US number of migrants. They clearly state they don’t need them – they need Russia. Either you work or we ship you out.

cleophis
9/8/2015 10:58 PM EDT
Russia and China have had plenty of problems on their borders with muslims over the years and don’t want any more. They are looking after their own people and country first – remember, they think long term rather than indulging in emotional knee jerk reactions.
fsaulinksy
9/10/2015 1:09 AM EDT
Post reporter Rick Noack is also “missing a demographic opportunity” since he could probably fit at least 3 sullen twentysomething Syrian men into his DC studio apartment. Just think of all the crazy and culturally enriching adventures little Rick could be having…
SamFarber
9/9/2015 8:35 PM EDT
Sick of propaganda like this. So blatant once you see the game people like this author is playing. Would he write an article saying how Israelis love the Palestinians and want a right of return of the Palestinians? All he would have to do is find more than one Israeli who said that and he could refer to them in the plural form and then make it sound like all of Israel believes that. But he wouldn’t because he is a COWARD that just does what he is told (though usually in a non-verbal manner.) He knows he is safe when he pushes this genocide of Whites via immigration.
Of course, an online forum nowadays would be incomplete without pathetic and oversued Muzzy taqiyya …
Michael West
9/9/2015 12:06 PM EDT
Good heavens! What a flock of ignorant, bored and pathetic racists assembled here. I live in a predominantly Muslim part of Copenhagen. During the last 15 years my Muslim barber has not cut my throat, nor my greengrocer poisoned me. Are they waiting for some signal? Or do they appreciate my visits and care more about surviving than about religious fanaticism? I find many of you people far more dangerous and threatening? Why? Because you’re individuals who bother to spread hate. It’s always somebody you hate, different races, different religions, different sexual orientation.. ….why not hate the corrosive chasm in your soul for once?
Michael West
9/9/2015 12:30 PM EDT
..and yet after 30 years and more of now 200,000 Muslims living here there have been 3 or 4 terrorist murders.. and most crime is Muslim drug dealers fighting Danish drug dealers.. poverty breeds crime.. just as affluence breeds crime on Wall street. I repeat, after 15 years in their midst I have seen no violence of any kind in my neighborhood ..especially of a religious nature. Religion is most important to haters.. of every culture. 
chowlett1
9/8/2015 4:13 PM EDT
Oh bosh. What makes you imagine they want to impose Muslim law (which btw strongly resembles western law) on anyone? People expose their ignorance by assuming there is one set of “laws” that are sharia, whereas in fact sharia law varies from one Muslim community to another, and many Muslim communities are very westernized – certainly Syria was. And NO, Muslims do not have a higher rate of rapists in their societies than we do. What are you going to do about the western rapists?
Kazek
9/8/2015 5:28 PM EDT
Your tea party teapot is overflowing; better turn down the hate flames
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedIn

Leave a Reply